Medic pronounces still-breathing woman dead

Yes, i have. And a lot closer to my home than I dare mention.
 
Nothing like quoting the grieving layperson husband as your primary (if not exclusive) source.
 
how do you get a pronouncement without being asystole on the monitor in at least 3 leads?
 
If we have an "obvious death" we do not have to run a strip.

But obvious is... Missing 3 or not limbs, decapitation, full body 3rd degree burns, lividity, rigor, etc.

But I highly doubt she had any of those if she was still breathing.
 
DrParasite said:
how do you get a pronouncement without being asystole on the monitor in at least 3 leads?
Click to expand...

We actually don't run strips on many pronouncements here. The way we see it... we do not resuscitate based on physiological criteria (Decapitation, Trunk resection, incineration, purification, destruction of brain or heart, etc.). Asystole is a treatable rhythm, and none of the physiological criteria require cardiac monitoring to determine.
We can cease resuscitation after ACLS measures have been attempted and are not successful, but that's a different story.
 
That article is extremely poor, as far as reporting quality goes. I am absolutely certain there is more to the story.

And the whole
Her husband questioned the medic's judgment, who made news last September when he called a medical helicopter for two children who had no major injuries — just cuts and bruises — after being hit by a heavy shelf.
Click to expand...

Is really a nice touch...how on earth does that relate?
 
lightsandsirens5 said:
That article is extremely poor, as far as reporting quality goes. I am absolutely certain there is more to the story.

And the whole

Is really a nice touch...how on earth does that relate?
Click to expand...

Odd to see a story on an EMS-specific website that seems to have a bias against EMTs/medics.

Husband seemed pretty cool about it. No crazy verbage, no fun adjectives.
 
lightsandsirens5 said:
That article is extremely poor, as far as reporting quality goes. I am absolutely certain there is more to the story.

And the whole

Is really a nice touch...how on earth does that relate?
Click to expand...

I think it was meant to show how big of an idiot this guy really is. Did you ever read the story associated with that event? He basically forced HEMS transport on these kids completely against the mother's will because of the MOI if I remember correctly.

I don't have to run a strip if I'm pronouncing someone on an obvious sign of death. Supposedly that's changed since I got hurt but reading our protocols it says an ECG should be attained unless doing so would disrupt a crime scene...well guess I still won't be doing ECGs on obviously dead people since they're part of a crime scene...and obviously dead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ugh. It's people like this that make me cringe. Don't mean to start this thread down a bunny trail, but people like that "medic" are reasons for higher educational and licensure standards that emphasize critical thinking.

flying a ped with a bump on her head to at trauma center + calling a DOA on a pt who was still alive = major questions about this guy's judgement and critical thinking ability.

f2amtq.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 5c980772cda3fc42aa90b41b1b880ee02cfe3714fff8fdef0b988b7dcfd44dd6.jpg
    5c980772cda3fc42aa90b41b1b880ee02cfe3714fff8fdef0b988b7dcfd44dd6.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 37
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know if the EMT was as totally negligent as it was made to sound, but a simple stethoscope would reveal if any resp or organized cardiac activity was going on...while you or your partner applied the ekg electrodes or AED.

Reminds me of the comment a few days ago in which someone said you could guess a serum glucose level by clinical signs.:unsure:
 
mycrofft said:
Reminds me of the comment a few days ago in which someone said you could guess a serum glucose level by clinical signs.:unsure:
Click to expand...
assuming you mean a blood glucose level, we do this all the time... usually on an apparently hypoglycemic patient, each medic and/or BLS provider will guess a number, and the person who is closest is treated to lunch or breakfast by the person who was further away.

not sure what you mean by this comment.....
 
The commenter implied a recordable glucose level number was deducible from clinical signs alone, not just HI or LO.
Or so I inferred.
 
If this medic did a poor, extremely brief physical assessment I can see trismus being confused with rigor mortis. If the Pt. died of a closed head injury it is certainly a possibility. Doesn't excuse it, but does help lead to a root cause identification for how this critical error was made.
 
There was an mnemonic device for obvious signs of death that I can't for the life me remember from like the second day of EMT class.

It was 8 signs, I think 5 of them were:
Decomposition, Decapitation, Incineration, Lividity, Rigidity

Can't recall the rest...Basically anything looking dead a while, burnt to a crisp, or without a head isn't going to be able to be brought back to life.

Different EMS systems have different stances on when to call it in the end though.
 
My absolute favorite phrase in EMS was given to me in my basic class as one of the reasons not to initiate CPR: "Injuries incompatible with life."

Off topic: a medic I used to work with was diabetic, and could keep operating way below a BGL I'd be happy to see, I once saw him do a test and come back with a 46, he was just a little extra *****y at the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top