- 8,009
- 58
- 48
Does this really need to be done by the school?
A 150 hour training course, how much could one actually expect to earn?
It takes longer than that to learn to cut hair.
http://www.barbercollegeonline.com/college_info.html
"Student are required and must complete (1500) hours before taking the state exam."
In some states, that's more than a paramedic too.
It is important to understand history.
EMS was developed in the US to give people a ride to the hospital.
With rare exception all treatment protocols end in transport or refusal.
Medicare/Medicade pays for transport and milage.
EMS is not recognized in the US as an independant body of specialized knowledge. It is a training.
Just like a mason, or a plumber, or a carpenter.
Before you talk about how much they make, consider there is always a nonunion person (usually a foreigner who accepts a lower standard of living than most first world citizens) who will put his very soul in to producing a quality product for next to nothing.
For the people who say EMTs are valuable, look at the national pay averages. "just in case" is worth just above minimum wage. Basically a fast food worker with a first aid course.
It is not a career to be a basic. It is a job.
Now somebody will talk about how thier agency pays basics grossly above market value. Certainly they do exist. But they are the exception, not the rule, so you are lucky to have those jobs.
There is a reason firefighters become EMT-Bs at least, it is a handful of hours on top of their other certifications. (measured in hours)
A 240 fire class, 20 hours of hazmat, and an EMT cert is still not 1/3 of a barber. Which is why there are so many fire certs. The more you can do, the more you are worth.
a 150 hour course (using the updated guidlines) is still one of, if not the lowest level of anything health care related.
I know many STNAs who are paid better. You know why?
Because it is more valuable to pay people to do the dirty work (like wiping *** and changing sheets) than it is to have a basic first aid provider "just in case," to do the minimum that will likely not cause harm, with the greatest amount of probability.
Helping your neighbors who cannot afford more is charity. Not a career, even if you are paid a pityful amount to do it.
As for the IFT EMTs, you might actually get paid more, if the state didn't mandate your employer to provide a $90k taxi equipped with stuff you will likely never use.
Unlike a taxi driver, you can't even ask for a tip.
You think it is a joke that many of us say McDs pays better? Look at the salary and benefits for a FT McDs or Starbucks employee.
I come from the generation where an EMT cert was a golden certificate that could ensure I could walk off the job today and be at work tomorrow. But those days are gone. They are not coming back.
Read this website, we constantly talk about how outdated and backwards many EMS treatments are.
In the last 15 years there has been more learned about medicine than in the entire prior history of man. What % of medicine do you think an EMT-B knows?
Mark my words, if paramedics don't shape up and advance themselves, they will be looking at the same fortune in a few years.
Great post. This is the heart of the "EMS 2.0" discussion. I'm not sure anyone has answers for all of this... But acknowledging the problem is the first step.
EMS instructors who tell you that you need experience as a basic before going on to medic are not looking out for your best interests, they are asuaging their own insecurities.
Nobody claims you should work as a line cook before becomming a chef.
Don't fall for that BS.
But don't you need some experience in a kitchen - even your own, before you go to chef's school?
I think it depends on the course. Some courses are built on the assumption you have XXXXX experience, while others are "Zero to Hero" programs. I've seen good medics, and crappy medics, produced both ways.