crotchitymedic1986
Forum Crew Member
- 73
- 0
- 0
moving this back to the refusal thread, as this is an IVpump thread. Please go to that thread for info regarding published studies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
moving this back to the refusal thread, as this is an IVpump thread. Please go to that thread for info regarding published studies.
moving this back to the refusal thread, as this is an IVpump thread. Please go to that thread for info regarding published studies.
Both statements are accurate: In the absence of lab and xray, I am against the individual medic being able to talk people out of going to the hospital. The solution I proposed solves that problem. I am not worried about the patient who actually refuses AMA, I am concerned about the patient who should be transported, but is talked out of transport, and then dies hours later.
And as far as the .01%, we hope that is the real number, but we have no idea. It could be 20% for all we know (actually there was a study performed by AMR that showed for every 100 patients who refused, you would have 7 hospital admissions, 2 ICU admissions, and 1 death).
Refusal topic moved back to the refusal thread : "ethical question", please post your questions there
Totally agree vene, it is due to poor education that we need the pump to protect the patient. You claim you can titrate with a 60 drop set, and many have memorized several clever tricks for calculating dopamine..
But if i changed the concentration of dopamine in everyones truck tomorrow from 800 to 400 or 1600mcgs, or vice-versa, most medics would be lost as to how to calculate an accurate drip rate. Patients lives are too important for guessing and guesstimating.
1. Supervisors typically respond to arrests and critical calls.
If it's not in a peer reviewed journal, then it isn't a scientific study and probably shouldn't be used outside of that company. Too many variables involved to simply say "Oh, because AMR said so!"That is the source: American Medical Response. I worked there when they did it back in the 90s. I doubt you can link it on the web, as that is not the kind of information a private, for profit service, would want floating on the web. It was an internal CQI project, but I am sure that anyone that still works there can get you a copy of it, as they frequently preached about it in every new employee orientation.
If it's not in a peer reviewed journal, then it isn't a scientific study and probably shouldn't be used outside of that company. Too many variables involved to simply say "Oh, because AMR said so!"
And as far as the .01%, we hope that is the real number, but we have no idea. It could be 20% for all we know (actually there was a study performed by AMR that showed for every 100 patients who refused, you would have 7 hospital admissions, 2 ICU admissions, and 1 death).