Firefighter loses job over nude photos

Foxbat

Foxbat

Forum Captain
Messages
377
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Firefighter loses job over nude photos
Discipline memo says he was seeking sex online

Haley Cihock

AUSTIN (KXAN) - Nude pictures and lying cost an Austin firefighter his job Wednesday.

Austin's fire chief indefinitely suspended Alejandro Garza after an investigation into his online activities.

In July, a man whose wife was having an affair with Garza alerted the Austin Fire Department about nude photos of Garza on the Internet.
Click to expand...


Read more

Not to condone what he did, but... seriously?
There should be a line somewhere limiting the extent to which an employer can control employee's off duty behavior.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the person can't be easily linked to the employer via those photos, I don't really care much about what the person does, as long as the activity itself is legal. What I *DO* care about would be an employee lying to me about it...
 
Funny story, my employer just came out with a veerryyy similar policy that basically says anything we do in our offduty time online can be punished by termination, even if it has nothing to do with the company...
 
It does seem over the top that someone can be fired for off duty online activity that isn't a crime. I get that lying was bad, and he should be punished for that. However, aside from the information that he works for the FD I fail to see how this affects his job. There needs to be a balance between what an employee can do online in their off time and what their job can punish them for. Had he posed nude in the fire station or something like that it would make more sense.
 
He did sign a Moral Clause, which I detest for situations such as this...but he agreed to it and then broke it.

Those clauses are too vague and too subjective for my comfort.
 
It also said Garza "brought further discredit to the department by including information which identified him as a firefighter in the City of Austin" in the postings.
Click to expand...

He deserved it for doing that - I wonder if the morality clause would have been brought into play if he hadn't included this information in his profile.
 
of course, both complaints happened to come from a concerned citizen whose wife happened to be having an affair with the firefighter in question......
 
That is B.S. This is yet another situation where an agency oversteps their bounds. What happens outside the station and off shift is your business, no one elses.
 
I dont feel they went too far. Had he not identified himself as an Austin FF, i would think him loosing his job was rediculous, but that was just completely careless on his part.

Like it or not, anything you post online can be found as easily as googling your name, or the companies name. He shouuld've been more careful and thought about putting his employeers name with naked pictures of himself.
 
He may not have listed his employer, he may have said something like "I am a firefighter in Austin". Which does indicate Austin fire, but could also mean he lives in Austin and works in an outlying area.

I agree he screwed up by mentioning his employer, but I don't see that as a firing offense.
 
I understand he signed a 'morals claus', which is becoming more prevalent in public service jobs. But I still don't like that employers nose so far into our private lives nowadays.

I have an acquaintance who was fired from his FF job due to his affiliation with a large motorcycle club. No criminal behavior, clean record, good worker ... gone. And he wasn't even a member, only a friend of the club. Another person (also a FF) in the same municipal department WAS a patch holder and left the club shortly after, and though I don't know for certain I must assume it was because he now understood it endangered his job. Another one ... a close friend was "laid off" from his corporate position shortly after his new manager learned he was affiliated with this same motorcycle club. Again, no criminal behavior, no felonies in his past, reviews from previous manager were stellar, etc. Gone.

It's stories like these that really torque me. I feel that within reason, and within the law, what I do and who I associate with on my own time should not be a consideration where my continued employment is concerned. I feel for the Austin FF. It sucks, even if he did sign a morals clause.
 
Aidey said:
I agree he screwed up by mentioning his employer, but I don't see that as a firing offense.
Click to expand...

It is if you Google Austin Firefighters or Austin Fire Department and you get a picture if him in his birthday suit.
 
When you are fire/rescue/ems/law enforcement you are looked at on and off the job as a "public safety professional". I know that on my department what you do away from work can be brought up at work for your dismissal. As public role models, it comes with the job. We have a responsibility role to play and we must respect ourselves and others enough not to do things to get in trouble over.

It would be all to easy to see some girl at the strip club/bar/etc. and someone say "hey that's the girl from the fire dept./rescue squad..." then you are automatically linked back to your department whether or not you are on the clock.
 
Discretion. It is all about discretion.

clearly not somebody hired for brains.
 
catch all (morality) clauses

akflightmedic said:
...Those clauses are too vague and too subjective for my comfort.
Click to expand...

Reason #682 why I will most likely never apply to a fire service... or wreck some poor saps wife.
 
Believe it or not, the flight service and trauma center that I work for forbids us using their name online as some bright individual using their logo as a signature on Flightweb dropped the "N" word a couple of times. The lawyers were not too happy.
 
medicRob said:
... the flight service and trauma center that I work for forbids us using their name online as some bright individual using their logo as a signature on Flightweb dropped the "N" word a couple of times. The lawyers were not too happy.
Click to expand...

Hmmmmm, let me guess... VUMC? No need to confirm or deny:P


My employer(s) expressly prohibits listing work email addresses, business practices, site photos, and/or unauthorized photos of co-workers (on or off work... yada yada yada) on social sites...

The only place I have any (basic) work info is on FB, and I am seriously considering removing it. Leave it to a few knuckleheads to ruin it for everyone.
 
This is one of the prime reasons I don't have a 'social networking' account!

I figure that as long as I don't mention a specific employer, what I do on MY time is MY business.

Just because my 'moral compass' isn't in line with everyone else, who's to say that its MY morals that are wrong?

There should be limits placed on the employer as to what they are allowed to pull from the employees 'private life' and hold against them in their 'public life'!
 
emtchick171 said:
When you are fire/rescue/ems/law enforcement you are looked at on and off the job as a "public safety professional". I know that on my department what you do away from work can be brought up at work for your dismissal. As public role models, it comes with the job. We have a responsibility role to play and we must respect ourselves and others enough not to do things to get in trouble over.

It would be all to easy to see some girl at the strip club/bar/etc. and someone say "hey that's the girl from the fire dept./rescue squad..." then you are automatically linked back to your department whether or not you are on the clock.
Click to expand...

If I am not in uniform or IDing myself as such, who cares what I wanna do in my off time, provided it is not illegal.

Who are you to judge the life I live?I know I'm not perfect -and I don't live to be- but before you start pointing fingers...make sure your hands are clean!
— Bob Marley
Click to expand...
 
BLSBoy said:
If I am not in uniform or IDing myself as such, who cares what I wanna do in my off time, provided it is not illegal.
Click to expand...

I think there is a line that can be crossed that makes something incompatible with your job while not being illegal. An example of this would be this guy, or a judge who belongs to the KKK. However, for the most part I do agree that off work behavior that does not affect ones job should be off limits for an employer to regulate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top