Do you make it a point to hire those who live in the town or hire those who speak the language or know the culture of the city that you work in.
your making several assumptions here. 1) that people who live in town are the best candidate 2) that those who live in town are "minorities" or who would make your agency more "diverse" 3) your assuming those who speak the local language are not white men, and that an outsider wouldn't fit in with the locals and 4) you are assuming that non-locals won't do the job as well as those who live in town, and as someone who enjoys working on ambulances and fire trucks in ****ty areas, I have 0 desire to raise my family in said ****ty area, but that doesn't mean I still won't do my job to the best of my ability.
What about Minority recruitment, does your agency try to show young minorities the EMS profession in schools and show them the potential as a EMS career in the future.
Why? and by that I mean, are there agencies that are showing the majority that EMS is a profession, and holding signs saying "minorities need not apply?" Everyone has the same opportunities, everyone should be given the same recruitment, speeches, if the "young minorities" either don't show up or aren't interested, is that a failure of the EMS recruiter?
I know outside of Major cities like Los Angeles, San francisco, San diego, Seattle, Chicago, Philadelphia, New York City and Boston, you would see a huge amount of Diversity within the EMS professions in those major cities.
are you kidding me? FDNY is so white and male, that it has a DOJ consent decree to hire more minorities. They get sued constantly, and their tests are accused of being racist (based on the end results of who scores the highest, not based on the content). I'm sure Chicago and Philly are the same way and I don't know how the west coast is. There is a constant battle between the NYC's administration and certain people as to whether standards should be lowered to allow for a more diverse set of employees or to only recruit the best of the best, and then only pass those who are able to complete the minimum job requirements to graduate from the academy.
Everyone has the same opportunity to apply, but if minorities chose not to apply, they don't get hired. see previous post about leading a horse to water....
Outside of them in the small towns and rural communities, Diversity and Inclusion is largely unheard of.
says who? what are you basing this on? Has there been any research on this topic? has there been any analysis on what this occurs?
if a small town or rural area is 100% white, do you expect the EMS agency to be very diverse? I have never seen any small town or rural community actively turn away minorities, or throw their applications in the trash, or tell them they don't fit what they are looking for.... What about those systems that are still volunteer based? very few people are turned, away, provided they meet the minimum standards.... you can't force people to apply to be a volunteer?
I have worked EMS in small towns in NJ, and everyone is welcome to apply.... I currently work in ruralish NC, and I see minorities on the ambulance all the time... but if the county is 99% white, do you expect EMS to be 50% non-white?
It's why places like FDNY and Boston EMS can be very diverse and inclusive, but how come they can replicate the same thing in the suburbs and rural communities.
Again, the cities are very diverse, but those employees did the first step by applying for the job... and they all did the same things that their white counterparts did.
In statistics, there is a common phrase: Correlation does not imply causation. Just because something appears to be connected, doesn't mean it is. Just because EMS has few minorities doesn't mean it's actively rejecting minority applicants, preventing minorities from applying or doing anything to not have a diverse workforce.
Unless you support the lowering of standards to allow for previously ineligible applicants to get hired, all in the name of "diversity"....