medichopeful
Flight RN/Paramedic
- 1,863
- 255
- 83
New phrase: "treat the big picture"
"Be a clinician?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New phrase: "treat the big picture"
EMTs save paramedics"Be a clinician?"
Yeah, but on the flip side I had a guy walk to me while he was in VTach and he looked really good as far as my first look impression went. I just dislike how it comes off as brushing off an important part of your assessment.Funny because i feel the exact opposite. I find that ive been getting more requests by BLS to treat based on one aberrant number than ever before. I think its a good phrase to help newer providers actually look at the patient and emphasis the importance of laying hands on the patient rather than looking at a computer screen
Yeah, but on the flip side I had a guy walk to me while he was in VTach and he looked really good as far as my first look impression went. I just dislike how it comes off as brushing off an important part of your assessment.
Driving code 3 period increases the risk of being involved in a TC substantially. We may drive safe while going code 3 but the general public does not.From the receiving physician side: Most medic's are amazing but some times ....well.... you know not so great. I personally think that all transports show be with lights and sirens. Someone called 911 because they thought that they were having an emergency they should be treated like they are having one until we prove they are not. I don't think an ambulance should have to be waiting in traffic or at every light in the city transporting a patient to the emergency department. Hopefully when the new triage, treat, and transport model get into full swing - the only patient's you will be taking to the emergency department will be the potentially emergent one's. Now with that being said there is a difference between driving code 3 to driving reckless. A patient is never so sick to do the later - it just put you, your crew, your patient, and others at risk of injury.
Driving code 3 period increases the risk of being involved in a TC substantially. We may drive safe while going code 3 but the general public does not.
So by your logic everyone should be transported code 3 because they called 911 and it could be an emergency however when I show up to the ED with 90% of my patients I am told to bring them to the lobby without them being assessed by the MD/DO or even nurses. Shouldn’t you be treating everyone as if it’s a life threatening emergency just because they show up to the ED?
I encourage you to do some shifts on the ambulance in the front seat to see how stupid people are when we are driving code 3. Your mindset on everyone gets code 3 will change when we are risking our safety and the public’s safety for a patient who stubbed their toe (yes these are 911 calls).
The statement of “I personally think that all transports should be with lights and sirens” seemed very much like a blanket statement regarding all ambulance transports regardless of the patient presentation.Actually, I was a paramedic for many years before medical school and even sat up front sometimes (two medic trucks); I get it. No, I don't think that you should risk your safety or the public's safety for the stubbed toe but this thread started on a patient in 2nd degree heart block. I am assuming they had some sort of cardiac complaint.
There are other logistics that I think influence a decision to use lights and sirens. I understand that there are reasons that the risk does not out weight the benefits....which I don't think has a blanket answer.
From the receiving physician side: Most medic's are amazing but some times ....well.... you know not so great. I personally think that all transports show be with lights and sirens. Someone called 911 because they thought that they were having an emergency they should be treated like they are having one until we prove they are not. I don't think an ambulance should have to be waiting in traffic or at every light in the city transporting a patient to the emergency department. Hopefully when the new triage, treat, and transport model get into full swing - the only patient's you will be taking to the emergency department will be the potentially emergent one's. Now with that being said there is a difference between driving code 3 to driving reckless. A patient is never so sick to do the later - it just put you, your crew, your patient, and others at risk of injury.
I can't believe that a board certified emergency physician would actually say this, maybe a intern or pgy 1.
Anyone who has spent any time in the ED from the unit secretary to the medical director knows that a lot of complete BS comes into the ED, and no shortage of it from the public who calls 911.
This looks a LOT like a blanket statement.I personally think that all transports show be with lights and sirens.
Hopefully when the new triage, treat, and transport model get into full swing - the only patient's you will be taking to the emergency department will be the potentially emergent one's.
By your own statements, since someone called 911, they must be having an emergency so we must treat them like they're having one until proven otherwise. This would, therefore, mean all 911 calls would terminate at the ED, not an "alternate" destination.Someone called 911 because they thought that they were having an emergency they should be treated like they are having one until we prove they are not.
I actually was (and am) a paramedic for many years. I'm also an ED RN of many years. You don't treat patients by sitting up front "sometimes."Actually, I was a paramedic for many years before medical school and even sat up front sometimes (two medic trucks); I get it.
Those of us who actually are or have been paramedics know this, and know this well. As a receiving physician, you should also know that we don't treat "potential decompensation" because everyone could potentially do so. If we know that our patient is about to decompensate in 10 minutes, or 8 hours, that'd be great! "Hey Doc, this patient looks great now but in about 8 hours, you're gonna have to code 'em."Please share your opinion as to when an ambulance should travel lights and sirens? When the patient is going to potentially decompensate in 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 1 hr, 8 hrs or Should they only go lights and sirens when the patient is in full arrest?
Given that Code 3 travel doesn't actually save as much time as you might think vs Code 2, you're not going to make an hour ride Code 2 magically become a 15-20 minute ride Code 3. What's going to make a world of difference is knowing that there's an evolving cardiac problem and choosing the correct destination. The time savings by choosing the right destination can be, quite literally, a matter of hours.15-20 min transport vs an hour transport can make a world of difference when heart muscle is actively dying.
I can't believe that a board certified emergency physician would actually say this, maybe a intern or pgy 1.
I’m a firm believer in using clinical judgement and all the tools at your disposal during every patient encounter.
From the receiving physician side: Most medic's are amazing but some times ....well.... you know not so great. I personally think that all transports show be with lights and sirens. Someone called 911 because they thought that they were having an emergency they should be treated like they are having one until we prove they are not. I don't think an ambulance should have to be waiting in traffic or at every light in the city transporting a patient to the emergency department. Hopefully when the new triage, treat, and transport model get into full swing - the only patient's you will be taking to the emergency department will be the potentially emergent one's. Now with that being said there is a difference between driving code 3 to driving reckless. A patient is never so sick to do the later - it just put you, your crew, your patient, and others at risk of injury.
Question above. Obviously, treat the pt, not the monitor. But there are also times in which I've had asymptomatic patients, or "little" sick ones, with a cardiac complaint - SVT, Vtach, LVAD problem, which all warranted code 3 returns.
I've never seen a 2nd degree before out in the field. Would a 2nd degree (I/II) warrant a code 3 trip?