Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An IV is an advanced skill and honestly should not be given to basics. There is much more involved than sticking the sharp object into the patient and letting fluids go in. Without proper education you can do serious harm. This is another problem with EMS many want the skills but not the education. Wow I am starting to sound like Vent.
So, why would it not be included with the proper education? Do you honestly think most schools would be like "Stick the sharp end into a vein" and send people on their way?
I say IV's SHOULD be basic skills, taught to basics, and added on to the current curriculum. Not saying drugs should be run from basics, but with the proper training, only good can come of allowing basics to do it.
Let the EMT do the IV while medic does the ET, then the medic can run drugs from the IV.
Like I said, with proper training.
The majority of IV training tends to go for the drugs used with the IV's, correct? The actual IV sticking part is relatively short.
So in saying that, it shouldn't take long to teach a few basic areas to do IV's, and then teach about saline. That's it.
No D50, no other IV drugs, just the IV and the saline.
EMT-B techs in ER do it all the time, so obviously it works.
Actually, I think NS and D50 would be great drugs to expand to the basic level, with proper education.
Maybe even Narcan as well seeing as it has less contraindications then Albuterol!
(Same with Xopenex)
Some areas do have Basics, yes, just Basics, not EMT-Is starting lines and being able to run NS. The insertion of an IV and how to tell if it's patent or not, and what to do when it's not patent, and when to do it is not as long and drawn out as you make it seem. An IV is not some intricate skill that requires intensive training and education.
I've heard some areas are allowing for the administration of Narcan intranasally by basics.
Have to disagree on this.
While the skill of sticking a needle in somebody’s skin doesn’t require much as IV drug addicts can do it quite proficiently, there is considerable knowledge that goes with using crystalloid solutions.
I know that popularly it is considered benign because of the low instance of complications, but because of the seriousness when those complications occur,(too vast for me to type out here) in addition the treatments for such, the administration of NACL requires background in pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology at least.
EMS leaders and advocates cannot get these topics properly covered in the minimum paramedic education, how could you possibly do it for basics?
As a simple cases what do you think the outcome of a saline bolus to a dehydrated marathon runner would be? Could others who are not athletes find themselves in a similar physiological state? What about overloading cardiac function?
If your instructors haven’t impressed upon you these and many more factors, I would demand some money back from the school.
But wheres the fun in that.![]()
But your answer is correct. Why does EMS focus so much on skills rather than education?
Let's answer this with a proper point and even a NREMT test question.Some areas do have Basics, yes, just Basics, not EMT-Is starting lines and being able to run NS. The insertion of an IV and how to tell if it's patent or not, and what to do when it's not patent, and when to do it is not as long and drawn out as you make it seem. An IV is not some intricate skill that requires intensive training and education.
This is an optional protocol in mass. My company is against basics administering nasal narcan. I know some other services in mass carry it at the basic level. Albuteral via neb and blood sugars are other optional protocols here. My company is only considering albuteral treatments at this time.I've heard some areas are allowing for the administration of Narcan intranasally by basics.