crash_cart
Forum Crew Member
- 97
- 0
- 0
My community beat back a local proposal to have flouride added to the water about six years ago. Fast forward to the present day-a state legislator wanted it mandated at the state level and got the bill passed, though local communities can pass their own ordinaces to prevent such a thing from happening.:wacko: On November 4th, we will go to the polls to vote on a measure to prevent flouride from being added to the city water supply. Every major argument against it is absolutely ludicrous according to my research? Too expensive?, tell that to the CDC which has found that for every $1.00 spent on flouridation, the average savings on health costs is $33.00. It is harmful? On that account, we might as well ban nitro from certain pts. as it could kill some folks. Not only that, but he CDC has backed water flouridation since the 1950s. Scientists can make a living debunking one another, if this had credible legs in any way, it would have paved for more than one comfy career at an ivy tower somewher. It's a communist plot?, well, I guess "collectivism" has it's benefits.
So, what arguments have you heard against it and what do you think? I can respectfully agree to disagree, I'm just rather miffed by the anti-flouride crowd's arguments.
So, what arguments have you heard against it and what do you think? I can respectfully agree to disagree, I'm just rather miffed by the anti-flouride crowd's arguments.
Last edited by a moderator: