I didn't understand the remark either. Without carrying this thread completely off of the rails I will add, most of my mentors have been and are older than I. The one thing none of them do is pigeon-hole themselves with labels. They, much like myself, are truly committed to learning over a lifetime. The ego has a funny way of keeping humility at bay circling back to the frustrations seen in outliers such as myself.
@MSDeltaFlt I'm not knocking you, and I have zero clue what sort of provider you are. What I am saying is progression is a result of reflection, and not the other way around. There's just absolutely no way for us to call this a practice if we're not keeping an open mind, especially when time and time again we're seeing improvements with technology such as VL, and its many manufacturers.
Equipment is equipment regardless of the type, so again, none of us understand what it is you're trying to prove. You check it like you would any other piece of equipment--frequently. As far as technique, while as
@StCEMT pointed it out, I think we're all pretty much in agreement on the importance of proper basic airway adjuncts and manuevers. Your testimonial remark has no place in this thread.
Back on topic~ I think one attempt with VL, then straight to a modernized blind airway is the near future, if not strictly SGA's. Aside from the services who actively practice routine, adequate airway training.