Ok, I'll take the bait
My archetype for a civilian tactical medic action is this: the medic/doc whatever wears entry gear and carries supplies to treat on scene or rapidly extract under threat or fire, and actually does this, repeatedly, not jut once in a career.
My non-archetype is all trained and dressed up but only stages or goes in after it is all over to treat and extract ASAP but not under immediate threat of or under fire. Or in front of a howling mob, active snipers, or whatever.
Not benchwarmers, and not peripherally involved, but where their trained and equipped presence in the hot area makes a difference in immediate care which could not be done by non-medically trained responders or trained responders without tactical training and equipage.
@Mycrofft... Alright you crusty curmudgeon, here goes my best shot...
As a tactical medic and tactical medical instructor, and since apparently my last post didn't clear things up for you, let's try again.
Your "archetype" and "non-archetype" are an oversimplification, and akin to comparing a SEAL to the movie SEALs. Do the SEALs perform mission behind enemy lines, do they use snipers, do they insert via submarine? Well, we all know that answers to this, but that's about where the similarities end. Yeah, I know, you want "justification," but you're asking a preloaded question with 50cc of prejudice. I'm going to try to illuminate the difference between what you perceive and what should happen.
So, I guess to best tackle this, would be to question, is a Tactical Medic (or whatever the latest buzzword is for the position, but will be referred to as "TEMS" guy for the rest of this post) an asset to a team, and are they actually an asset, strictly used as an EMS provider or is there a separate skillset that provides the commander an asset whether they "suit up" or not?
The quick answer is if all they do is perform TC3/care under fire, then probably not. Are there circumstances that an advanced EMS provider can provide the difference between life and death for either the subject or the officers? Yes, is statistically large enough that the cost of the roll out of whatever tactical medic program country wide is practical? Probably not.
Now this goes into, what does the person attached/joined to a tactical unit bring to the table? Assuming that all things are equal for tactics, fitness, etc... The TEMS guy should be as specialized as your breacher, as your point man, as your radio/communications, as your commander, not a subtraction from the team, but a team member that has additional proficiencies.
Is medical planning necessary for operations? Is medical planning necessary for training? Does one have to have an understanding of how operations conducted to adequately advise the use of, let's say OC in a hostage rescue when a hostage has a known case of respiratory difficulties? Is there another specialist on the team that can step up and recognize the symptoms of cyanide poisoning? Much less the treatment? Now keeping in mind that not all SWAT/ERT missions are entries, there is alot more to the planning to the team than just the sexy, "bang, cross, button hook, clear." Protective missions, surveillance missions, negotiations, these all have a medical component and assessment that should be briefed to the commander prior to mission. This takes a far better understanding of the team and capabilities than a rig medic is going to bring on a rotational basis. This also changes on each individual mission, and the assessment of a non-TEMS guy is like a coach of a bunch of 7 year olds playing soccer trying to tell an NFL coach how to run defence.
Are we putting the "cool guy" stuff out there, and taking people who have no idea that there are enormous changes between missions even within the same department in charge? We are putting people in protective masks and having them bag simulated intubated patients in the dark without consideration of why they are in protective masks. IV sticks with night vision goggles, OD green sam splints, and more black and velcro than we know what to do with, but it all boils down to the same basics that we hit here over and over again. Lack of education and lack of understanding lead to a piss poor product, and that is what alot of the schools are turning out now. Even worse for "tactical EMS" because there is very little standard, and mission dynamics change so much that alot of what the TEMS guy needs is a solid understanding of how his team operates, then he can work his medical voodoo into the mix.