Sort of a Fire question, but still public safety

I think it has been said before, but this way of saying it helped me out.

Although they are slightly different, think of combustion as oxidation. (Actually it is, but through a different, rapid, exothermic reaction.) So, in our minds now: Combustion=Oxidation.

So we have the equation: (fuel) + O2 = By products...often H2O vapor in the case of Hydrogen containing substances (Most fuels) and CO2 in Carbon containing substances (Largely the class A type fires)

In the case of Hydrogen combustion we get:

2x H2+O2 = 2x H2O (Technically 2x H2+O2 <=> 2x H2O)

So we see that the rapid, complete oxidation of Hydrogen (catalyzed and driven by heat) results in the formation of water. Water is essentially a "by product" of the combustion (rapid, exothermic oxidation) of Hydrogen. Because Hydrogen is now already oxidized, it is no longer available to its environment, neither is the Oxygen that oxidized it. Of course the reaction will run in reverse, given the right conditions. But simply the heat and chemical chain reactions caused by, say a structure fire, are just not enough to drive the equation to the left.
 
lightsandsirens5 said:
I think it has been said before, but this way of saying it helped me out.

Although they are slightly different, think of combustion as oxidation. (Actually it is, but through a different, rapid, exothermic reaction.) So, in our minds now: Combustion=Oxidation.

So we have the equation: (fuel) + O2 = By products...often H2O vapor in the case of Hydrogen containing substances (Most fuels) and CO2 in Carbon containing substances (Largely the class A type fires)

In the case of Hydrogen combustion we get:

2x H2+O2 = 2x H2O (Technically 2x H2+O2 <=> 2x H2O)

So we see that the rapid, complete oxidation of Hydrogen (catalyzed and driven by heat) results in the formation of water. Water is essentially a "by product" of the combustion (rapid, exothermic oxidation) of Hydrogen. Because Hydrogen is now already oxidized, it is no longer available to its environment, neither is the Oxygen that oxidized it. Of course the reaction will run in reverse, given the right conditions. But simply the heat and chemical chain reactions caused by, say a structure fire, are just not enough to drive the equation to the left.
Click to expand...

But the heat generated with flammable solids such as magnesium will drive the equation left, but as I eluded to earlier, water has specific properties that are different from most chemicals.

Generally there is a whole chapter on it in general chemistry, biochemistry, and molecular biology books.

The subject is too complex without that level of background understanding before discussion.

As a small example, the bond angle actually is unique to water and carries specific properties.
 
Exactly, I thought I mentioned magnesium and other class D fires.

Guess not.
 
Okay take it to a fire forum this is not ems related. I've got my eye on this. :ph34r:
 
but,but, what if someone were to accidentally eat sodium, or was shot with a sodium tipped arrow?

I know, call Mythbusters.


OK lightsandsirenssmartypants, what if you ignited beryllium in chlorine, huh? Then what? (You will nice no female conspirators are participating in this little excursion...)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NOTICE, not "nice". Darned Apple OS!
 
JPINFV said:
There's worst things... my undergrad had a nuclear reactor.
Click to expand...

Did you go to MIT? Or are there others lurking around the country?

Funny how MIT doesn't really play up the research reactor anymore. After all, BU's gotten such a good reception for their BSL-4 lab.

I'd take the low-power reactor over either of the other two, actually.
 
A local former USAF base found traces of weapons grade uranium in the soil near the base dump about fifteen years after it was decommissioned (still very civilian active). What's with THAT?

Oh, the authoritative source about alkaline metals:
http://mythbustersresults.com/viewer-special-threequel
 
medic417 said:
Okay take it to a fire forum this is not ems related. I've got my eye on this. :ph34r:
Click to expand...

Well... In a way, water chemistry does apply to EMS. :mellow:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top