I personally understand that SIDS cases at first makes us become " human " in the response that it touches our emotions more than most calls. Families are the innocent victim of a tragic event, that a sweet angelic life was taken way before its prime. Yes, one can question life considerably.
I as well believe that discussing the problem with some "senior" members or trusted staff is invaluable. As well, more and more hospital chaplains are specially trained in dealing with grieving families, and yes helping medical providers cope with such bad situations.
I am fortunate, my hospital chaplain (whom now is my minster) is great! The hospital mandates grieving training and updates for all staff members. From the housekeeping to physicians. Especially, those in critical areas such as ER and ICU, that sees death and horrible events on a daily basis.
It is nice to have an non-judgemental ear sometimes....
With that saying, and not trying to hijack this interesting thread, I believe SIDS and pediatric calls are still way misunderstood. So many times, the treatment and how we perform is not in reference to the patient. Our focus is really upon our uncomfortableness and dealing with a horrible situation.
What is the difference in pronouncing an 80 year old versus an 8 day old, if conclusive signs of death was present? Again, not trying to be cold hearted rather fully seeing the whole picture. As I become more experienced, a code is a code, if I make the determination that get 100% or nothing. This is why I request field termination on many. Realistically, resuscitation is very futile except on a very few. Again, as we discussed those with certain criteria.
I believe we will see more exact criteria as the ethical dilemma is addressed more and narrowed down in specific criteria and guidelines. Even AHA and American Pediatric Physicians have agreed upon some new criteria as delivered in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) .
R/r 911