So, I gotta ask you:
if this is a scenario, what was supposed to tip us off to the outcome? I don't see how it is thought provoking to go through a scenario that is completely "atypical". I bet that some of the higher educated members here can present cases that present almost identical to this with completely different diagnosis.
And so, in your scenario, when someone suggests something, you immediately tell them that they're completely wrong(like suggesting a Pulmonary Embolism, or to consider bagging the patient, both perfectly logical considerations.)
So just out of curiosity, what did you do for the pt and what did you think it was... and why?
if you don't like the scenario, move on along... no need to come out here and criticize for no reason.
the point is to realize that there are MANY atypical presentations, and we are supposed to be AWARE of all of them.
assessing is about thinking... the very nature of a thought provoking scenario is to come up with possible differential diagnoses, and atypical presentations. if you just want to scoop and run, go back to the 70's.
as for giving hints, forgive me if i tried to steer the group in the right direction!
those that participated liked it. then you come along after the fact to poke holes in it... what is the point of that, really?
since you are so knowledgeable about how to do a good scenario, please, i look forward to seeing yours... although i doubt i will.
Last edited by a moderator: