- 4,521
- 3,243
- 113
Yup.
Which translates into screwing their creditors.
My opinion is, Warburg Pincus, the investment firm that bought them (purely to make money), pushed for this to happen. That way, they can get rid of debt they don't want to pay, and become more profitable. Which means the investment firm makes more money.
I have a problem with the way that works. Why should people and businesses who are owed money have to settle for less of it, when it was Rural/Metro's business decisions that have landed them there.
I'm glad I'm not working there anymore.
Good question.
In theory, bankruptcy judgements are supposed to take that into account and come up with a deal that is not-too-unfair to the creditors. It's not intended to be a "get out of jail free card" as much as it is a way to come up with a deal that causes everyone involved the least amount of pain. Losing money to a bad investment is a risk creditors accept when they decide to loan money, and an important part of a free market. The alternative could be that the creditors get nothing at all, if the company doesn't declare bankruptcy and then can't re-organize and eventually just goes completely under.
In actual practice, you can unfortunately get situations like this, where powerful execs with knowledgeable legal staffs exploit the law for personal benefit.