Aidey
Community Leader Emeritus
- 4,800
- 11
- 38
Hmm....
I agree that the nurses behavior was totally unethical, and inappropriate and firing them was probably the best move.
However, if the x-rays did not have any identifying information on them that could identify the person, hospital, date etc then I don't think they should be prosecuted.
I see a bit of a slippery slope here when it comes to using things like EGKs, X-Rays, CT scans etc for education purposes. When I was a MICP student we had to do case studies, and we never obtained permission from the patient when doing these studies. The only requirements were that the patient was someone we had direct interaction with, and we had to scrub the medical records of everything but age and gender before removing them from the hospital.
My concern is that things used for educational purposes could be caught up in regulations aimed towards preventing things like this from happening.
I agree that the nurses behavior was totally unethical, and inappropriate and firing them was probably the best move.
However, if the x-rays did not have any identifying information on them that could identify the person, hospital, date etc then I don't think they should be prosecuted.
I see a bit of a slippery slope here when it comes to using things like EGKs, X-Rays, CT scans etc for education purposes. When I was a MICP student we had to do case studies, and we never obtained permission from the patient when doing these studies. The only requirements were that the patient was someone we had direct interaction with, and we had to scrub the medical records of everything but age and gender before removing them from the hospital.
My concern is that things used for educational purposes could be caught up in regulations aimed towards preventing things like this from happening.