Partners who think they are the hospital.

Status
Not open for further replies.
abckidsmom said:
Or we could assume for the sake of discussion, which is all this is, that what he said was true, fully detailed, and completely accurate. Having assumed all of that, we could then discuss THAT situation, without relevance to the actual situation, I we choose to believe that there is anything wrong with discussing a one-sided scenario.

And in the future, we could choose to contribute our opinion or knowledge on the topic at hand and maybe not question the veracity of posters.
Click to expand...

Had he posted it as a scenario I would agree fully. OP made blatant attack though of his partner w/o allowing a defense. Big difference there. Had it been posed as hypothetical event w/o attacking an individual then yes I agree lets presume the one side presented is 100% accurate but in this case the OP came to us asking us to bash his partner w/o all the facts being presented.

All I have done is try to get all those that attacked the partner to recall that they have not been given enough evidence to do so.
 
NYMedic828, Don't mind Medic417, hes kind of an :censored::censored::censored: He likes to sound holier then thou and make smart :censored: :censored: :censored: remarks to get a reaction and start arguments. Sounds like your "partner" needs a wake up call. He sounds like a poor patient advocate and should probably be talked to by someone... Sure we only hear your side of the story, but from the facts you are giving, sounds kind of like he is full of himself. Good luck with dealing with him, every agency has people like that, makes it rough for the rest of us.
 
Remeber343 said:
NYMedic828, Don't mind Medic417, hes kind of an :censored::censored::censored: He likes to sound holier then thou and make smart :censored: :censored: :censored: remarks to get a reaction and start arguments. Sounds like your "partner" needs a wake up call. He sounds like a poor patient advocate and should probably be talked to by someone... Sure we only hear your side of the story, but from the facts you are giving, sounds kind of like he is full of himself. Good luck with dealing with him, every agency has people like that, makes it rough for the rest of us.
Click to expand...

Well thanks for the compliment. :rolleyes:
 
medic417 said:
Had he posted it as a scenario I would agree fully. OP made blatant attack though of his partner w/o allowing a defense. Big difference there. Had it been posed as hypothetical event w/o attacking an individual then yes I agree lets presume the one side presented is 100% accurate but in this case the OP came to us asking us to bash his partner w/o all the facts being presented.

All I have done is try to get all those that attacked the partner to recall that they have not been given enough evidence to do so.
Click to expand...

But by that statement you are saying there is enough evidence. You just said so yourself, if he would have posted it as a scenario, you would have fully agreed. Now you say since he added the bit about the partner, it makes your first thought of agreeing null? That makes no sense.

Also, I would not say this is bashing, I would say he is just venting. He isn't asking us to bash either. Just wanted input.
 
Remeber343 said:
But by that statement you are saying there is enough evidence. You just said so yourself, if he would have posted it as a scenario, you would have fully agreed. Now you say since he added the bit about the partner, it makes your first thought of agreeing null? That makes no sense.
Click to expand...

Nope an accusation is not a scenario. Big difference that any intelligent person can easily see.
 
adminsn1.gif


That's enough of this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top