Arovetli
Forum Captain
- 439
- 19
- 18
here's an rx for norco for pain/ abx for the infection, & be done with it.
Narcotic scripts delivered right to your door? I can only imagine how much the call volume would increase if folks knew they could get written for narcs and not have to leave their own couch.
One of the big problems with this paramedic practitioner/EMS 2.0 stuff is that there is simply no good way to finance it. Most viable ambulance services are large private companies or one's who derive the majority of their revenue from non-emergent transports or ones attached to city's or large hospitals who can sustain the ambulance with other revenue sources. You would have to completely overhaul the current insurance system or charge up front payment to sustain an advanced practitioner. Besides there are already plenty of mobile NP/PA's that offer home health services already out there, but these are only utilized by folks who can afford it.
In 7 years of EMS I can't think of any situation where an expanded scope of practice or prescribing rights would have significantly affected patient outcome. The utility of a midlevel provider staffing a routine 911 truck would be so limited that it would be financially untenable. Unnecessary transports are a problem and a financial drain but I seriously doubt an advanced provider will solve this problem. No amount of advanced procedures or years in training is going to reduce abuse of the system. It is simply cheaper and more efficient in our current system to take the patient to the provider than to take the provider to the patient. If you want to do home health as a midlevel then become a midlevel and do home health.
Now if there is a need in your particular system for expanded scope then you need to sit down with your medical director and ask to have whichever procedure or drug permitted and then train your personnel sufficiently on said procedure/drug.
Now I'll agree that the current state of paramedic education is weak at best and could stand to be improved. More basic science, clinical exposure and an increased emphasis on caring for chronic care pt.'s is needed. However there's already EMT-B's, EMT-IV's, AEMT's, EMT-I's, and paramedics. The last thing we need is to add another level of prehospital provider to the mix.
It makes for interesting conversation and is nice to think about but I seriously doubt that a paramedic practitioner is practical in the US. It may be a pessimistic approach but being a medic means accepting the limitations that go along with it. There are plenty of ways already in existence to advance yourself professionally.
Last edited by a moderator: