odd call...

It's been beaten to death, but other than the o2 I'd have done the exact same thing, well I would've driven and my partner would've taken the call ;)

There's 8 million threads about o2 administration in EMS, do we really need another one?

As far as her vitals technically she still is WNL and like you said she's pissed off that someone just tried and failed to give an enema so her vitals make perfect sense to be slightly elevated.
 
Why was a thread from 2 years ago replied to?

Because when people start new threads they get yelled at for not searching :lol:
 
I beg to differ, want to argue it with me?


2z4wlzr4880327.gif
 
I think it's pretty straight forward I don't really know what your argument would be for?
 
And vene just to be clear I was talking specifically about causing harm to the pt with copd by administering O2 in the prehospital setting.
 
I think it's pretty straight forward I don't really know what your argument would be for?

There was a study (I will try to find it) that showed similar poor outcomes with both hypoexemia and extreme hyperoxemia in TBI patients. They argued that there is a very narrow PaO2 range that is ideal and that any variation outside of that, both hypo and hyper, is associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality. You have plenty of time during a transport to jack a patients Pa02 up.

Just one example. I am sure Vene will do a much better job than me
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's pretty straight forward I don't really know what your argument would be for?

The argument would be for not giving the patient a medication they don't need.
 
And vene just to be clear I was talking specifically about causing harm to the pt with copd by administering O2 in the prehospital setting.

Don't make me quote myself...
 
If you read all my post from this thread it should be clear what I'm stating not saying it's ok to administer a medication that is not warranted (yes I know O2 is a medication) just disputing the incorrect information on the pt population with COPD and the risks of administering 02 to them. Was the the 02 in this particular scenario needed... In my oppinion probably not. Did it hurt I don't believe so. Would I have givin O2? Not unless pt requested.
 
Realistically In pre-hospital care the Pt contact is not long enough to cause harm using O2. And they would of hopefully been informed by staff at the snf if indeed the pt had copd and most people with copd are on 2lpm or 4lpm via nc anyways.

That statement does not look like it is limited to COPD patients to me.

If you read all my post from this thread it should be clear what I'm stating not saying it's ok to administer a medication that is not warranted (yes I know O2 is a medication) just disputing the incorrect information on the pt population with COPD and the risks of administering 02 to them. Was the the 02 in this particular scenario needed... In my oppinion probably not. Did it hurt I don't believe so. Would I have givin O2? Not unless pt requested.

I think I just typed something about this very topic here a few days ago...

http://www.emtlife.com/showthread.php?t=31932
 
Vene I did clarify in post right after that one that I was specifically referring to pt with copd and it seems like it would be stupid to argue about what I meant. So I am telling you what I meant.
 
Vene I did clarify in post right after that one that I was specifically referring to pt with copd and it seems like it would be stupid to argue about what I meant. So I am telling you what I meant.

Please refer to my posts in the thread I linked to save me the trouble of typing them again.
 
I really think your misinterpreting what I was saying. And have missed other post so there for you are making good arguments but not valid to our particular discussion. Obviously very knowledgable but my point still remains that O2 administration to the pt with copd in the pre hospital setting is enough to effect there hypoxic drive into respiratory arrest. To further clarify in a long transport situation I would hope that you would a pt history that included there copd and you would follow the guidelines of that piticular pt o2 administration that many live with. Wether or not we ( ems) as a whole are causing more damage with our habits of giving o2 to people who don't nessarliy need it, was at no point in my thought process and to me is a completely different subject that I was not referring too or even thinking about. Hope this helps and we are on the same page. That was an interesting thread you sent me to thanks.
 
I really think your misinterpreting what I was saying. And have missed other post so there for you are making good arguments but not valid to our particular discussion. Obviously very knowledgable but my point still remains that O2 administration to the pt with copd in the pre hospital setting is enough to effect there hypoxic drive into respiratory arrest..

I understood this point.

My point is that there is a very specific patient population that EMS probably very rarely sees where the oxygen given to a COPD pt can cause harm.

As pointed out in my statement, these patients are often found hospitalized, however, they may be found occasionally in long term care facilities.

As I am sure you have discovered responding to most nursing homes, the staff there usually know very little about their patients, if anything at all. So it is not unreasonable to explore the possibility that any given patient found there may potentially be from this very limited COPD population.

Also consider subclinical effects that EMS does not see, but subsequent providers must deal with.

To further clarify in a long transport situation I would hope that you would a pt history that included there copd and you would follow the guidelines of that piticular pt o2 administration that many live with..

If I may?

I would suspect that if the pt had COPD and was having an acute exacerbation in the prehospital environment and they were normally on o2, that their Po2 would be abnormally decreased from their baseline to cause a worsening of symptoms.

In particular to history, since home oxygen therapy permits symptomatic relief and increases quality of life on a temporary basis, how long they have been on home oxygen as well as their presentation would probably lead me to positive pressure being the better treatment choice. If given the ability to adjust oxygen content, I would try a slight elevation in the amount of oxygen provided they didn't look like an end stage "blue bloater" which I have been specifically educated to recognize as the subset of COPD patients that will be harmed by high flow oxygen administration.

It stands to reason that if a COPD patient who is normally prescribed oxygen is having an exacerbation significant enough to activate 911, then their current oxygen dose must not be adequete?

In all likelyhood, assuming the non specific subset of COPD patient, and absent a positive pressure device, I would elect to increase the amount of oxygen being administered from their normal prescription.

What I would certainly not do is put them on 15l of NRB. That is like using a cannon to kill a mosquito. As I pointed out, it can also cause pulmonary injury that appears post EMS contact. Patients with long term COPD don't have a percent or two of pulmonary reserve they can spare and are already suseptable to infection and inflammation without adding superoxide to the equation.
 
I can agree with all of that :)
 
Back
Top