As you know, down under have no requirement to contact "medical control" for anything. Brown has been thinking more and more about the concept of having to ask permission and wonders how it works.
A good example Brown has found is asthma and anaphylaxis protocols often state you must obtain an order for adrenaline, and then it is often only IM and not IV adrenaline whereas we can start an adrenaline drip.
OK so lets say you have a critical asthmatic or anaphylactic patient who when you turn up is at the point of impending respiratory failure. One of the first things we'd do here is give adrenaline.
So lets say you cannot and must obtain an order.
Who do you talk to? Do you just ring up the hospital and wait until they run round and find a Doctor? Does your medical director have a cellphone? What if nobody is avaliable? What do you do in the meantime, sit on your hands and go oh sorry patient, its not your fault you died, we had to ring up and ask the Doctor first!
Another good example is morphine. Brown notices often you are allowed piddly little doses of morphine that Brown has maxed out in one go and its done nothing, eg we gave a NOF fracture 10mg one night and it did nothing, neither did the other 5 we gave her. The ketamine worked a treat however.
Now, lets say you have maxed out your morphine dosage and want to do something novel like give the patient a bit of midazolam. Are you likely to get approval?
What if you think the order the Doctor has given you is not appropriate or inconsistent with good patient care, lets use Brown's previous example. You have an old lady with a NOF facture who you cannot move because of irrectractable pain which is greatly impeding treatment and transport. The 10mg of morph you gave her has done nothing but "medical control" won't allow you to give any additional morphone or some midaz and tells you to "bring patient to hospital".
In this circumstance can you challenge the order or ask to speak to somebody different, the Consultant Physician for example?
This concept seems rather odd to Brown and any clarity you folks who work it would be appreciated.
Thanks
Brown
A good example Brown has found is asthma and anaphylaxis protocols often state you must obtain an order for adrenaline, and then it is often only IM and not IV adrenaline whereas we can start an adrenaline drip.
OK so lets say you have a critical asthmatic or anaphylactic patient who when you turn up is at the point of impending respiratory failure. One of the first things we'd do here is give adrenaline.
So lets say you cannot and must obtain an order.
Who do you talk to? Do you just ring up the hospital and wait until they run round and find a Doctor? Does your medical director have a cellphone? What if nobody is avaliable? What do you do in the meantime, sit on your hands and go oh sorry patient, its not your fault you died, we had to ring up and ask the Doctor first!
Another good example is morphine. Brown notices often you are allowed piddly little doses of morphine that Brown has maxed out in one go and its done nothing, eg we gave a NOF fracture 10mg one night and it did nothing, neither did the other 5 we gave her. The ketamine worked a treat however.
Now, lets say you have maxed out your morphine dosage and want to do something novel like give the patient a bit of midazolam. Are you likely to get approval?
What if you think the order the Doctor has given you is not appropriate or inconsistent with good patient care, lets use Brown's previous example. You have an old lady with a NOF facture who you cannot move because of irrectractable pain which is greatly impeding treatment and transport. The 10mg of morph you gave her has done nothing but "medical control" won't allow you to give any additional morphone or some midaz and tells you to "bring patient to hospital".
In this circumstance can you challenge the order or ask to speak to somebody different, the Consultant Physician for example?
This concept seems rather odd to Brown and any clarity you folks who work it would be appreciated.
Thanks
Brown