Also late to the party. I think you guys are picking on the wrong person.
I'm sure the plaintiff has very few resources, and is not paying for a lawyer out of his own pocket. Almost certainly, a lawyer is working for a contingency fee, perhaps as high as 50% (and maybe only after legal fees). Which means the plaintiff probably stands to win frak-all.
So, my take on this is that this guy is getting taken advantage of by a US citizen, a lawyer who is willing to take the risk of having his client receive death threats, so that they (the lawyer) have a shot at the lottery.
The plaintiff is being put up to this, and I bet that most scrupulous attorneys would not have taken this case.
EDIT: Evidently, the attorney is Ed Ferszt. His website states that "Mr. Ferszt is a regularly featured guest on a variety of a.m. radio consumer protection programs and has been called upon to to offer legal opinion on various media outlets in the Denver metro area." I.e., He likes media attention. Fancy that!