medic417
The Truth Provider
- 5,104
- 3
- 38
It would appear that the oxygen tubing could become "contaminated", but not the oxygen source itself (the bottle.)
You do discard the delivery tubing do you not?
So do you discard the low pressure regulator?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would appear that the oxygen tubing could become "contaminated", but not the oxygen source itself (the bottle.)
You do discard the delivery tubing do you not?
What proof do you have that it does become contaminated?
So do you discard the low pressure regulator?
By your own logic in previous comments just because there has not been a double blind study to prove it doesn't does not mean its not.
so did you not read the excerpt or did you fail to comprehend it?
even with forceful coughing, co2 was measured only 5cm from the mask and only in a few patients. With the delivery system disconnected from the oxygen source(no pressure against expired gas) co2 was only measurable up to 1 meter form the mask.
Some quick things to thing about when applying this case to masks used for humans in EMS
1. We don't use lower flow masks like they used in the study. I'm not sure what type of mask that they were using, but considering that only a delivery rate of 2-5 L/M was used, it's safe to say it wasn't a non-rebreather.
2. NRBs have one way valves which prevent the problem seen with coughing.
3. Higher flow rate would mean less penetration of CO2 into the line on the patients that actually were able to achieve it.
I hope your kids aren't vaccinated. After all, according to Jenny McCarthy all vaccines do is give kids autism. Sorry, the burden of proof is on the one making the fantastic claims.
All the reasons you have listed above, only make the idea of expired gas flowing back into the oxygen tank, all the more less likely.