So are you saying EMTs shouldn't be on this forum? And at what point of medical education is the line drawn?
Are you truly saying and seriously consider that the EMT is actually medical training?
Whenever the EMT curriculum
starts to have education in lieu of training, then we can be able to discuss professional status.
Here are some good hints, when your medical training is not an education:
> Your class is described in clock hours instead of degrees with internships or fellowships.
> Your text is written < junior high level reading level.
> There are brightly colored pictures within the text. There are associated work books with crossword puzzles.
> You use only
one text for the entire program.
> Your National Certification has a > than 50% first time pass rate.
Remember, the Basic EMT Curriculum is
just above the First Aid level. It is an entry point or initial care provider level. That's it. As you described, it’s a starting point. Not middle, post or anything more than that intent. Nothing wrong with it, but it is what it is.
That is part of the problem with many outgoing of EMT Basics. Majority of the graduates have no true medical education (unless they have a previous medical license) and do not realize their limitations.
No one is blaming or chastising, it’s just the truth. Sorry, you don’t like it; that’s the way it is. They should had taught and re-enforced this from the beginning in your Basic Course. It is alike the comparison of a Nurse’s Aide to an RN, there is a place and role for each. Alike, what Vent described. No matter if you have a PhD or GED, according to your level of EMS education that is the system is. Don’t like it? Go back to school.
R/r 911