mycrofft
Still crazy but elsewhere
- 11,322
- 48
- 48
I wonder what the synergistic effects of beer and girls has on perceived pain?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While I'm not entirely certain, I suspect that it is definitely related the amount of ice used and seriousness of facepalm applied later...I wonder what the synergistic effects of beer and girls has on perceived pain?
Can't fault you for the truth if you give an honest, full, and accurate description of the risks.
The caveat would be that the Ottawa rule was validated in the ED setting, and applying it on scene may or may not be as accurate. Two good reasons might be that you're not as smart as an ED doc, or that "ability to ambulate since the accident" is one of the rule-ins and you're assessing them much earlier, thus less opportunity to walk. Neither of those seem to apply, since you're very smart, and they ruled out anyway. Still, it hasn't technically been validated for EMS use, unless I missed that study.
A somewhat abbreviated description of all this would be a part of informed consent...
Do you ask 'em to walk if they haven't tried yet?
Let patient know it's probably not broken, see what they want to do.
Hate to agree with the "non medical" answer but basically this. Regardless of whether it is broke or not based on the description and the complaint they don't need an ambulance. They don't need an ER visit. I can give them a phone number for the orthopedic in the area, they can schedule an appointment or head to an urgent care. Save them time, money, and headache...I guess I would even be super nice and do an ace bandage and some ice before they leave.
Pretty much what I do. I transport less than 5% of my pts( probably closer to 1%). Most all are treat and release or treat and refer. I get the odd AMA but they are rare.
Can't fault you for the truth if you give an honest, full, and accurate description of the risks.
The caveat would be that the Ottawa rule was validated in the ED setting, and applying it on scene may or may not be as accurate. Two good reasons might be that you're not as smart as an ED doc, or that "ability to ambulate since the accident" is one of the rule-ins and you're assessing them much earlier, thus less opportunity to walk. Neither of those seem to apply, since you're very smart, and they ruled out anyway. Still, it hasn't technically been validated for EMS use, unless I missed that study.
A somewhat abbreviated description of all this would be a part of informed consent...