Yes, we have some "stupid protocol" that says everyone that requests transport by ambulance gets a ride to the ER. I most certainly have taken pts to the ER that I believed would have been served just as well by getting in one of the 6 cars parked in the driveway and driving to the ER, immediate care center, or the family doctor's office on their own. However, when transporting those patients, I don't do things to humiliate them. I still do my job - monitor vital signs, get as thorough a history as possible, provide comfort measures, etc. I don't provide (nor have I ever) fake treatments to my patients.
Go for it.
Melcin - it's a "stupid protocol" to transport someone that requests it and may very well need it? Wow.
Misconceptions:
1. Melclin thinks it's okay to make fun of a pt to their face.
2. Melclin thinks it's stupid to take a pt to hospital that requests it.
Corrections:
1. I never said it was. Don't put words in my mouth. What I argued was that it is conceivable that the medics intentions may not have been malicious, and that it may have been falsely perceived that way by the student observer (this may also have coloured the way in which he told the story). It is also conceivable that, given a set of circumstances, of which we are unaware, this may have been an appropriate course of treatment. We weren't there, we don't know the whole story (in fact we know very little of the story), so I feel that given the possibility of a perfectly reasonable and ethical alternative explanation of the situation other than that they were just negligently and maliciously trying to humiliate the pt, that you should back of on the condemnation (as long as the issue is humiliation and intent, rather than the lying, which is a separate issue: see final paragraph*). I think it's likely that they were simply jerks (and I did say that), however, I was playing devils advocate seeing as though everyone seemed so keen to demolish the medics based on bugger all evidence.
I realise it doesn't actually matter, it's not like you're opinions are sending them to jail or anything. I just hate it when people angrily jump to unreasonable conclusions without considering that there might be another side to the story.
2.What I said was: "Why would you take them to the ED otherwise?" [in reference to a good clinical reason]. Then "Unless they were adamant to go themselves" [meaning that the pt wanting to go, is the other reason why you might take them to ED, the inference being that while there might be nothing clinically wrong, their desire to go to ED is good enough. I can, perhaps, see how "themselves" taken out of context could be taken to mean that they would privately attend the ED, but
in the context it seemed clear to me, to mean "they wanted to go"]. Otherwise we are perfectly within our rights to tell pt that they don't need to go to hospital and to assist them, if necessary, in seeking more appropriate care.
*More generally if you want to make the argument that lying to the pt is
always wrong then I would love to argue the Morality/Idealism vs. Utilitarianism with you, however, I'm not sure this thread is the place for that more general issue.