EMT Stole Ambulance Supplies to Kill Wife - Angel of Mercy or Psycho?

Mountain Res-Q

Forum Deputy Chief
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
1
Points
0
This happened in March, but I don;t remember anything about this, so...

http://www.wave3.com/Global/story.asp?S=11403156

So, basiclly, the woman had Crohn's Disease and was on various pain medications. The husband, an EMT employed by an Ambulance Service, stole IV supplies, with which he administered undisclosed medications to his wife over a period of 6 months (including crushed pills).

911 was called when she arrested; apparently as a result of "a lethal combination of Phenegran and Hydrocodone"; mind you, she was also on Dilaudid.

Here is what gets me:

"Russ (the LEO Investigator), a former EMT himself, began interviewing several of Whitehead's (the EMT accused) co-workers at Yellow Ambulance. One stated to Russ, that Whitehead pulled out a knife at work and told people his wife 'didn't love him anymore and he should go kill his wife or kill himself.' An employee who filed sexual harassment claims against Whitehead said there was a known concern about his mental status. She told police Whitehead would come up from behind, grab her breasts and say 'he would kill his wife to be with her.' Another employee said the harassment included Whitehead sending her a picture of his penis."

Excuse me??? Does this seem a "tad odd" to you and reason for concern if you were a co-worker? And he is still working for them? He still has access to these supplies? He wasn't considered a danger to self and others? In EMS, Scene Safety is preached like gospel. We (usually) stage for a call where the pt is suicidal and/or a danger to others... It sounds like his co-workers should have been staging outside crew quarters at the start of every shift, waiting for LE to arrive and secure the quarters, removing the EMT for a psych hold. No one saw this coming? :wacko:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
this guy should have been evaluated by a psych and definitely not been employed as an EMT. this is another example of all the warning signs in place but no one taking the proper measures to prevent a bad situation from happening
 
Wow!! That is really crazy that no one did anything about him before this!!! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I worked with said EMT one shift. After that shift I told supervisors I would never work with him again and it wasn't questioned as he had very few people willing to work with him. He was pretty psycho and no matter the number of complaints against him, the old administration at Yellow Ambulance would not fire him.

It's something I think could have been avoided, granted I worked with him sometime in early 2008.
 
I worked with said EMT one shift. After that shift I told supervisors I would never work with him again and it wasn't questioned as he had very few people willing to work with him. He was pretty psycho and no matter the number of complaints against him, the old administration at Yellow Ambulance would not fire him.

It's something I think could have been avoided, granted I worked with him sometime in early 2008.

Sounds like the 'Old administration' should also be held accountable.

The actions described in the statment, particularly
She told police Whitehead would come up from behind, grab her breasts and say 'he would kill his wife to be with her.' Another employee said the harassment included Whitehead sending her a picture of his penis."

Show this person has an obvious problem. It isnt necesarrily a psych problem.
More than likley a personality disorder. However, sexual harrassment in any workplace is not acceptable & he should have been dismissed with criminal charges pending. Although I am wondering if they took pity on him after they saw his penis in the picture he sent.:P

Euthenasia is still illegal in most countries, including the US, but that is a debate for another thread. Provided we can keep the religous zealots from hijacking it.
 
It isnt necesarrily a psych problem. More than likley a personality disorder.

Care to explain how a personality disorder is not, by definition, "a psych problem"?
 
Care to explain how a personality disorder is not, by definition, "a psych problem"?

I can give you an example.

Ted Bundy was classified with a personality disorder that could be differentiated from other forms of psychotic disorders that allowed the State of Florida to give him the death penalty and carry through with it.
 
Care to explain how a personality disorder is not, by definition, "a psych problem"?

I would suggest that you check out this link http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv & take the test. You will be surprised I am sure.

True 'psych patients' have a diagnosed psychiatric illness. A list can be found http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Psychiatric+illness.

The World Health Organisation have started that by 2020 Mental Illness wil be the second biggest killer worldwide, behind trauma.

EMS will see personality disorders daily, but never do much for them. Personality disorders tend to effect a persons way of life & functionality, such as Obsessive Compulsive disorder, & with treatment, can be rectified without the use of drugs in many cases. They are generally considered a psycholgical disorder.

Psychiatric Illness effects the total life of the person, they require medication to control what is happening & they will be on those meds for life.
 
So I took the test -

Disorder Rating
Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: Low
Schizotypal: Low
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Low
Avoidant: Low
Dependent: Low
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low

I guess I am pretty balanced today. If I had taken it at the end of a s**t kicker 48, I may not have scored as balanced.:rolleyes:
 
Can I assume from this kaisu & exodous that you both now know the difference between Psychiatric illness & personality disorders?
 
True 'psych patients' have a diagnosed psychiatric illness

Can I assume from this kaisu & exodous that you both now know the difference between Psychiatric illness & personality disorders?

But a personality disorder, by definition, to be present (and not just in the commonly used sense of "he's an :censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored::censored:/weird/scary and therefore he has a personality problem") would require a diagnosis of one of the recognized personality disorders (which are psychiatric illnesses). That was the point I was driving at and not anything to do with sanity vs insanity, etc. You seem to be missing the point I made earlier.
 
Ted Bundy was classified with a personality disorder that could be differentiated from other forms of psychotic disorders that allowed the State of Florida to give him the death penalty and carry through with it.

It's because personality disorders are usually described along the lines of "narcissistic personality disorder with sociopathic features", "antisocial personality disorder with psychotic features", "borderline personality disorder with depressive features" to further specify the nature of the patient's condition. It was the "descriptor" (or rather the implications of that specification i.e., whether he was legally responsible for his actions and if so, to what degree) versus the "main diagnosis" that I believe you're referring to or at least that is what I was taught by a psychiatrist who taught the abnormal and criminal psych course I took.
 
Generally, & as with all medicine, even moreso with mental illness, there are many grey areas. There are many people who function in society with a personality disorder, with no underlying psychiatric illness.

OCD is one, there are many people with narcissistic personality traits that are predominent in certain situations, that do not have underlying psychiatric issues.

I did understand what you were saying. If you look at the results that were posted, one, at the time the test was taken, had no predisposition to any associated disorder, the other was predisposed to multiple disorders. Does this mean they will not be able to function? No. If it got to a point where they saw a psychiatrist & were diagnosed with a personality disorder alone, then chances are they would be refered on for assessment & treatment by a psychologist. There is also a sideline there that depression can be an associated factor, as it can be with chronic illness, undiagnosed illness etc. This type of depression is usually transient & in time the person will no longer require assistance.

True depression, or as you described
borderline personality disorder with depressive features
means the person suffers depression primarily & the borderline personality disorder is amplifying that. Probability is that even when the personality disorder is treated, the person will still be suffering from depression.

Yes they require a diagnosis from a Psychiatrist, but that is where the similarities end.
 
Generally, & as with all medicine, even moreso with mental illness, there are many grey areas. There are many people who function in society with a personality disorder, with no underlying psychiatric illness.

OCD is one, there are many people with narcissistic personality traits that are predominent in certain situations, that do not have underlying psychiatric issues.

Then why is it a psychiatric diagnosis in the DSM? That is the source of criteria for OCD. Either you meet the criteria or you don't have the disorder. I admit there are a lot of grey areas, but just because we use "OCD" to describe anyone who is a little uptight does not mean people who have it- truly have it- do not have "psychiatric issues".

I am assuming by "psychiatric issues" you mean that they are demented, sociopathic, non-functionality or otherwise severely disturbed. There are a lot of people who have psychiatric issues who are very high functioning at least most of the time. I think this is where the breakdown in communication and understanding is occurring: you're speaking in very general, unprofessional (laymen's) terms to express your opinion while I am attempting to stick to the strict diagnostic criteria of the psychiatric profession.

True depression, or as you described
Quote:
borderline personality disorder with depressive features
means the person suffers depression primarily & the borderline personality disorder is amplifying that. Probability is that even when the personality disorder is treated, the person will still be suffering from depression.

Try again. Most personality disorders are notoriously hard to treat, but it does not imply the the primary problem is the depression. The underlying condition is paramount with the depression overlaying it. Usually the description I used is given when the person does not meet the necessary criteria for the second diagnosis of depression, etc. If the primary problem was the depression it would be described something along the lines of "clinical depression with narcissistic features" if there was not the full criteria being met for a second diagnosis of NPD. Do you see what I am getting at here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would suggest that you check out this link http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv & take the test. You will be surprised I am sure.

... It's relatively short, yet claims to tell you your level of risk for all sorts of personality disorders. The next suggested quiz is that Dante's Inferno thing. Does this sound like a valid test from a legitimate site to you? If so, go read up on testing development and administration. Tests like that are fun, but please don't recommend them as being useful for anything.

If anyone wants a real personality disorder test, I'd recommend the MMPI-2. It's a lot harder to find and a lot less fun, though.

Psychiatric Illness effects the total life of the person, they require medication to control what is happening & they will be on those meds for life.

No, they don't always require meds, and patients usually won't be on a particular set of drugs for life. Plenty of people never require them, come off of them, or only require them occasionally. Meanwhile, pretty much every patient will have their meds adjusted or changed several times over the course of their treatment.

It's quite irresponsible of you to make completely false claims on a forum where people actually try to learn things. You're obviously interested in the subject. So please do yourself a favor and take some psych classes--try abnormal, assessment, and clinical--before trying to educate others. At the very least, read up on the subject from legitimate sites. You can even start with Wikipedia... a lot of their psych articles are actually decent.

VentMedic said:
Ted Bundy was classified with a personality disorder that could be differentiated from other forms of psychotic disorders that allowed the State of Florida to give him the death penalty and carry through with it.

It's still a psych problem... just not one that meant he couldn't tell the difference between right and wrong, and/or couldn't control his impulses to do wrong. In most states, those two criteria determine legal insanity. You can have plenty of psych problems without being legally insane, though I don't know of any cases where the reverse is true.
 
Gotta love these tests..

Disorder Rating
Paranoid: High
Schizoid: High
Schizotypal: High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Very High
Histrionic: Moderate
Narcissistic: High
Avoidant: Very High
Dependent: High
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate
 
... It's relatively short, yet claims to tell you your level of risk for all sorts of personality disorders. The next suggested quiz is that Dante's Inferno thing. Does this sound like a valid test from a legitimate site to you? If so, go read up on testing development and administration. Tests like that are fun, but please don't recommend them as being useful for anything.

If anyone wants a real personality disorder test, I'd recommend the MMPI-2. It's a lot harder to find and a lot less fun, though.

This was a suggestion & not intended to be a full diagnostic test. It is, however a reasonably similar test used for a quick evaluation.



No, they don't always require meds, and patients usually won't be on a particular set of drugs for life. Plenty of people never require them, come off of them, or only require them occasionally. Meanwhile, pretty much every patient will have their meds adjusted or changed several times over the course of their treatment.

Yes I agree & stand corrected. Many will be on meds for a period & then come off, however there are also a number who will be on meds for life.

It's quite irresponsible of you to make completely false claims on a forum where people actually try to learn things. You're obviously interested in the subject. So please do yourself a favor and take some psych classes--try abnormal, assessment, and clinical--before trying to educate others. At the very least, read up on the subject from legitimate sites. You can even start with Wikipedia... a lot of their psych articles are actually decent.

I have stood corrected on 1 point. Yes I am interested in the subject, however, but please dont tell me to take a class when you dont know me, my experience or credentials, especially from 1 comment made in error. I have studied psych illness & actiually understand the difference between a personality disorder & a psychiatric illness. I would also suggest the quality of information of wikipedia when they state
Welcome to Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
 
especially from 1 comment made in error. I have studied psych illness & actiually understand the difference between a personality disorder & a psychiatric illness

You made more than one error. I've counted at least three you've made based upon your comments and suggestion of that insipid little test being even close to a valid "quick assessment". Just because you've studied something doesn't mean you understand it well enough to extrapolate or apply it. In my case, a good example of this is that I've studied calculus but I sure as hell can't argue it against those who know it better than I do, just like you can't defend your stances against two people (Seaglass and myself) who understand your "area of interest" a hell of a lot better than you do.

Either you're wrong and don't want to admit it or the Aussies play by entirely different rules than the rest of the world because there is no such distinction according to the internationally applied DSM-IV-TR standards which list personality disorders as Axis II psychiatric illnesses (see: http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/prsnltydsrdr.htm). I am a big believer in Occam's razor: the explanation that requires the fewest assumptions if probably correct. I also hereby posit what we can call USAFMEDIC45's razor: The most likely explanation is that you're full of **** but your ego won't let you admit you're wrong.

Quoting from that website: "The purpose of DSM-IV is to provide clear descriptions of diagnostic categories in order to enable clinicians and investigators to diagnose, communicate about, study, and treat people with various mental disorders". We are not talking the legal definitions of sanity, mental fitness or anything else. We are talking strictly the clinical diagnoses here and a personality disorder IS a psychiatric illness (or mental disorder, same animal only describe in slight more politically correct terms), regardless of what you want to think you know about these illnesses. You are arguing the psychiatric equivalent of saying that mild asthma really isn't a lung disorder because it's "mild".
 
Back
Top