A different opinion.....
So, after everyone has this guy tried, convicted and sentenced, let me offer up a different perspective:
Only recently are we in EMS, and emergency services for that matter, really addressing the issues about emergency driving, and trust me, it's far from all the driver's fault.
First, take the classification of emergencies: P1 (D&E jobs), P2 (C), P3 (B) and P4 (A) (this is the classification that most places use with EMD). In our region, calls are WAY over triaged by 911. At least half of our priority 1 jobs are BS. "Leg pain with trouble breathing." "Fall with a cardiac history." P2 jobs are not much better: "Chest pain (for the 8th time this week)." I work in a city whose population is about 215,000. Fire only responds on P1 EMS jobs, but we are expected to respond lights and sirens, per company policy, and all P1, P2 and P3 jobs. We have a 7 minute 59 second response time for P1 and P2 jobs and 15 min 59 sec on P3 jobs. For every call where we don't make the time frame, we have to (as a company) pay a fine to the city. From the research that I've heard, that 8 minutes for P1 and P2 jobs is completely arbitrary and not based on any proven reduction in mortality. Also, I used to have a boss that would regularly quote (and I've never found the academic reference to it) that there is a 400% increased risk that someone will die in a motor vehicle collision just from us turning on our lights.
So, the 911 center makes a ton of ridiculous calls high priority jobs, the city puts arbitrary and unrealistic time frames on them, refuses to send BLS FR for calls that we are required to go red for, and our company mandates red responses and regularly reminds us that time exceptions cost us money, which could be raises and increased benefits. Thus, we are going red FAR more than we should be.
Sure, our company has policies, like no more than 10 mph over the posted speed limit, ever. Driving with due regard. No lights on the expressway. No distracted driving. But those policies are in place to protect the company. What they really mean is "don't get caught doing these things".
My question is, if this guy had a drive cam, and was caught going 83 mph into oncoming traffic, and there was no collision or incident, what would have happened with him? I'm betting a warning. If that's the case, it makes this whole thing a witch hunt.
The whole culture needs to change. At least in our city, fire and police (fire especially) have HORRIBLE emergency driving practices. Our crews will approach an intersection from another direction and routinely hit the panic button on the drive cam and watch fire completely blow the intersections with NO regard. We can't understand why they haven't killed someone yet. We also now have intersection cameras that catch people blowing the red lights. If we do, then the driver has to pay the $50 fine. That includes if you get too close to the crosswalk but never enter the intersection. Police and fire are getting the fines too. Know what the police do even more then? Turn their red lights on feet before the intersection and run it. I can't wait for THAT to cause an accident and see the lawsuits.
It's all a wink and a nod; just don't get in an accident, because we really need you to make it in under 8 minutes to all these calls. If you break the rules, it's OK. Wait; you got in an accident? We are go to strictly apply the rules, and you better hope to God you didn't break any, or you're on your own.