Difference between a B and a I

I am a hybrid user. I have a PC laptop (tablet) that I love and a used MacMini on my desk, that I love. I dabble in IT work and web design, and separate my work and play through my different machines. I have a third computer-- an old PC I have patched together with used (free) parts that I am playing with running Linux on. It's a project for me-- I haven't spent much time on it lately-- but it is my own way of learning the Linux environment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why don't we change the name of the thread, "Difference between a Mac and a PC" or "Why Macs are better"

*Whispers* It's our secret thread ;)

What version of linux are you using?
I was using Gentoo but it took too much time to maintain so I just switched to Ubuntu trying to get the wife interested in it so I can sacrifice, ummmmm switch, her vista laptop to linux
 
I was using Gentoo but it took too much time to maintain so I just switched to Ubuntu trying to get the wife interested in it so I can sacrifice,

Ubuntu was fun for personal use; I prefered SuSe for more IT work

I'm not anti-Microsoft at all. They make superior enterprise/business products. And Office turned out to be a good hit (I have it on my Mac).

My main computer is OS X Leopard. I have 1 XP (tablet (linux & windows)) and one runing Windows Server 2003.
 
Also an EMT-I in ga. Live in Newnan, work in Troup County (Lagrange)
 
Also an EMT-I in ga. Live in Newnan, work in Troup County (Lagrange)

how dare you try to bring this back to the original topic. blasphemy!!!
 
imagesmac-2dvs-2dpc-2dmotorcycles.jpg



B)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At a recent computer expo, Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:

“If Ford had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five pound cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon”

In response to Bill’s comments, Ford issued a press release stating the following: “If Ford had developed technology like Microsoft, we would be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, your car would die on the motorway for no reason, and you would accept this, restart, and drive on.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart; in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought ‘Car98’ or ‘CarNT.’ Then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water, temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single ‘general car fault’ warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same bum size.

9. The airbag system would say ‘Are you sure?’ Before going off.

10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna

11. Ford would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of A.A. road maps, even though they neither need them nor want them Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car’s performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more.

12. Every time Ford introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You’d press the ‘Start’ button to shut off the engine.
 
It'll be fun to watch all of the Mac owners when Mac ownership rises enough to attract the attention of the people who make virsuses. Afterall, make viruses for 90+% of the computer market or less than 10% of the computer market? Easy choice.

From the very beginnings of OS X, Apple has been very adamant about security. OS X includes built in firewalls and several layers of protection that are second to none. We do not have to buy or download third party crap to protect our computers. Its much harder to attack a UNIX kernel than a Windows based PC. The way things are set up, we will likely never have to worry. -Daedalus, CCNA
 
I might as well contribute my hijack to this thread.

I've got seven computers in my home, 5 of which are at my desk. 5 computers run Ubuntu Linux, and two run XP Pro. Three computers are dual boot, but almost always are booted into linux.

If I really want to run a MS program on my computer, I do it from linux using a virtual machine.

And for the most part, I'm the only person I'm aware of that consistently browses this website in linux.:P
 
Thats hardxcore! Linux and 5 CPUs?? I think we got ourselves a erm...hacker...
 
Back
Top