If you can, go straight for your paramedic certification.
Bad idea in my experience. Most medic school washouts are EMTs with no street experience. Remember, BLS before ALS, so a good medic must first be a GREAT EMT!
As for the difference in I vs P, in MN there is a world of difference, varying on were you work. The arguement that the diff is small, consisting of a list of drugs and procedures, is missing the larger point. In a cookbook world of paramedicine,
it's OK to look at it like that. But if we are to advance the profession, we must be thinkers. Were I work, there are no protocols, just guidelines and lists of meds and procedures. A medic should be able to work towards the problem at hand, and the totality of the pt. condition. This requires a strong knowlegde base, heavy in A&P, and well versed in critical thinking. How many EMT-I's can explain to me the different treatment modalities of rt vs Lt AMI or heart failure? how many can articulate the pathophysiology affecting treatment of a STEMI in a CHF pt? The ramifications of end stage renal failure
in a pt whom missed dialysis? I cant tell you the times when my EMT-I partners questioned my judgement becuase they did not understand the back story. One even wrote me up for not starting a STEMI alert, and not flying a pt to the cities' heart hospital becuase of mild chest pn, with global st elevation in a otherwise healthy 33 yo male. I had to explain to all that it was strongly suspicious for pericardititis, not stemi
. By no means am I stating that EMT-I's are not smart, but they lack the intense education that I would like to see in our medics. Good Luck!