John Kerry is a :censored: and a fake.
That's another issue all together and I'm not going there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
John Kerry is a :censored: and a fake.
That's another issue all together and I'm not going there.
Wow !..and you guy's thought I was controversial.... .now, you know how I feel about the rest of the remainder of EMS personal...LOL...
R/r 911
Wow !..and you guy's thought I was controversial.... .now, you know how I feel about the rest of the remainder of EMS personal...LOL...
R/r 911
That is the truth...and we have a few here who are unfortunately not very competent. Example, someone gave Ativan IM with a BLUNT cannula. This was done without consulting med control, and the only Ativan we have on orders is IV for adult SZ...and this person is bragging about giving it IM with the blunt cannula. As in a plastic blunt cannula at that!!!!<_<
Actually to dispel slander, one has to prove that your repetition has been professionally slandered by means of either change in income status, professional status (such as discharge from employer) patients or other peers have change in professional status, and this was can be directly proven by their statement alone.
If the person wrongfully posted should then definitely clarify their statement if it was wrong. The person did not state name or even service(s) name or location.
Now, I am wondering if you did perform such the procedure(s) as was discussed, do you really want this to brought up in more detail. If the so-called events really did occur as described, potential liability, potential gross negligence could have occurred. I myself, would not want to open those can of worms. Definitely, this could be more drastic than one's reputation. Then one would not have to worry about such afterwards.
Again, the only the truth should be discussed or at least fictional scenario.
R/r 911
Things I Like And Hate
I like ems and emtlife.com
I hate lawyers and I hate peanuts and i hate guys with peanut sized brains and I hate guys with peanut sized gonads
I am writing to let you know that you have posted inaccurate information in the afore described events. You are guilty of slander and liable as well as smearing my charactor in a public forum. I will give you until Jan. 5th to post a public appology AND a written apology to me with a copy to our Director. Please be sure to state that you did not have first hand knowledge of the events and it was your intention to ridicule me and alienate me within the service in which we work. If you do not comply you can speak with my lawyer and we will start proceedings right away.
Rid... You said it.Actually to dispel slander, one has to prove that your repetition has been professionally slandered by means of either change in income status, professional status (such as discharge from employer) patients or other peers have change in professional status, and this was can be directly proven by their statement alone.
If the person wrongfully posted should then definitely clarify their statement if it was wrong. The person did not state name or even service(s) name or location.
Now, I am wondering if you did perform such the procedure(s) as was discussed, do you really want this to brought up in more detail. If the so-called events really did occur as described, potential liability, potential gross negligence could have occurred. I myself, would not want to open those can of worms. Definitely, this could be more drastic than one's reputation. Then one would not have to worry about such afterwards.
Again, the only the truth should be discussed or at least fictional scenario.
R/r 911
I cannot discuss anything other that what I have written my lawyer will take care of what needs to be taken care of. My lawyer must think there is enough here to do something with or would not have taken the case. I have stated all Mr Lundis needs to do.
I will state that some of the information given to me was given to me by someone else, who was closely involved in said incident. I however never named this individual, or stated where they work. I am not interested in naming names or throwing mud, just in making sure that people can learn from other's mistakes. Since it appears I have offended this individual I will apologize for offending you, and not discuss this incident any further. As to the other requests you have made, we can discuss those personally and privately, as it was never my intention to bring your name into this in the first place.
Hopefully this will resolve this issue and I certainly have learned that from now on I will change the entire situation before I even remotely consider discussing it with the group. It's a shame that this has come to this, however I am in no mood to deal with the whole lawyer thing, as the only lawyer I like to speak with is my cousin who happens to be an assistant US attorney.
Furthermore, I don't see how I slandered you as I never named you or the service in this incident.
Very interesting read.
I wish I was in Mr.Lundis shoes cause I would say bring it on and go :censored::censored::censored::censored: yourself.
First, this is total BS and quite the frivilous lawsuit. He never named names, service worked for or even a remote goegraphical location. Even after all he said, I still have no idea of who, what, when or where as none of this was provided or hinted at. You are way off base as you just published his name on a public forum. You revealed more information to us about him than he did about you. What a freaking moron. Obviously by the way you are reacting, it seems to me like there is way more to this story than we will ever know.
For the record, if you have money and look enough, any lawyer will take a case. And yes, some will do it with no fee up front but when you lose, look out, time to pay the piper.
However, and unfortunately, your case will probably play out like this: your lawyer and you sue the service. They get a lawyer and realize it will be cheaper and faster to give the little whiney *** employee (you in this case), a settlement and close the case instead of battling it out in court which can take months to years depending on the backlog. The settlement is usually chump change, 10K or less, you feel vindicated and go on your way to screw someone else over in the future and the service takes a hit and cuts back on salaries or doesnt make an equipment purchase or provide some educational opportunity quarter. Unless of course its a larger service or goverment organization.
Either way, you are a douche bag, especially to be here battling it out on a website. What a farking joke!