d
> DO NOT tell me how much you want to be a Firefighter or Nurse! BINGO! Your through! Sorry, but you want me to place money and time on you for you only to tell me that you are going to leave me? Kinda like a love relationship saying, I want to marry you but I plan on divorcing you in a few years or months..... Sorry, administration does not want temps... or to be used as stepping stones. It costs and takes a lot of time to employ people. Hiring process, drug tests, physical, background checks, over time to test, plus then we average 3-6 months of field orientation with an FTO before they are cut loose on their own. Now, you say your going to leave as soon as your "dream" job comes available.
R/r 911
I usually agree with R/r on everything except this. I would like to know that you plan to continue your education. I don't want to encourage someone to be an EMT-B or even a Paramedic forever once they see what the medical profession is all about and how many opportunities there are. We definitely don't discourage CNAs, Phlebotomists or RT equipment techs in the hospital from advancing even if it is not within the same department. In the U.S., both EMT B and Paramedic require barely enough hours of education and training to give a student a true chance to evaluate the profession. Being an EMT can still compliment the nursing profession if their ambitions take them to the ED, CCT and Flight. Even if it doesn't, the experience can be worthwhile. The same with someone who has worked as a CNA during EMT school. If nothing else, it will give them a chance to see the differences between prehospital and inhospital care. Both CNA and EMT-B are entry level where there is still room for a lot of exploring while searching for the right fit. 120 hours of training should not lock anyone into a career that is not right for them.
To pass up an ambitious candidate who could provide a breath of fresh air into an otherwise stale job academically because they don't want to remain an EMT-B for the next 20 years could miss out on a great employee even if just for 2 years. The ideal employer should also be supportive, even if it is not always financial, of any academic endeavors whether it is for Paramedic or Accounting. I would have more respect for a candidate who is honest about their ambitions for better things than one who has no ambitions at all except to ride in an ambulance.
I think it would also be a little hypocritical of someone with other licenses listed behind their names to discourage someone from pursuing other areas of medicine. I know many people who have done a lot of college while working as EMTs or Paramedics. It did not affect their performance on the ambulance especially if they were taking more sciences and medical classes. If anything it helps in their communication skills and professional presentation.
I don't believe the nursing or RT professions get offended if someone advances to NP, PA or MD school.
One of the reasons people do move on and out of EMS is working with people with no ambition or any concept of what healthcare is about. Too many of their co-workers believe their 700 hours of training is more than enough education.
Of course, "I want to be a Paramedic so I can be a FF" doesn't cut it as being academically ambitious. So no, those candidates should not make the top of the list for selection in a non-fire based service.
There is also the warm body mentality present in some ambulance services that do prefer their employees have no ambitions.
Last edited by a moderator: