Atrovent for Pediatrics

Tigger

Tigger

Dodges Pucks
Community Leader
Messages
7,877
Reaction score
2,832
Points
113
Had a pretty good asthma exacerbation today, 11yo female with global inspiratory and expiratory wheezing in all fields. Albuterol rescue inhaler used twice prior to arrival and we provided 2 additional nebulized albuterol treatments along with 100mg of Sol-Medrol. The albuterol had zero effect on lung sounds or the patient's work of breathing (which oddly was not particularly great). Generally in this scenario I would think a duoneb would be the next step to try and alleviate the bronchospasm.

However, both protocols that I work under do not allow for Atrovent use in patients 13 years or younger. I can find nothing to support this, but did find a half decent study showing some benefit in using it. So what gives? Are we just behind?
 
In medic school our pharmacology instructor told us not to use it in pediatrics, however our protocols allow us to use .5mg.
 
DesertMedic66 said:
In medic school our pharmacology instructor told us not to use it in pediatrics, however our protocols allow us to use .5mg.
Click to expand...
Did he or she say why? I see lots of places do not use it for pediatrics, but no justification.
 
I'm honestly not sure anymore. I may see him on Monday so I'll ask if I get the chance.
 
"Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population below the age of 12 have not been established."

Ipratroprium is not FDA approved for peds. So despite several studies (I found references to a handful in a 5-minute Google search) proving its utility, the manufacturer probably never paid to jump through all the hoops to get it approved for peds, and so the wizards at the FDA have not seen fit to give us permission to use it.

I don't know how much it helps anyway, but if I thought it would help in a given situation, I would use it. We use drugs for off-label uses all day long.
 
We can give atrovent with albuterol for adults and peds, 500mcg across the board, with 2 repeats of atrovent every 20 minutes.
 
Ours is the same for adults...0.5mg neb solution. I've not heard of it not being used for pedi's.
 
I use it all the time for peds. Our PICU docs have us do 3 duonebs for kids that are going to end up in the unit. As for why it is not FDA approved for peds is probably like Remi said. There is no money to be made by running the necessary trials to get FDA approval.
 
Duly noted, perhaps a call in will deal with that next time.
 
We use terbutaline for peds 0.01mg/kg SC but only if the ped is in RA..

Once loaded, we use Atrovent (0.5) only with the first dose of Albuterol for a pt in mod/severe resp distress..
 
Tigger said:
perhaps a call in will deal with that next time.
Click to expand...

I've done it once for a male pt, about the same age. No change after one 0.5mg Albuterol neb, so I called in and got the go ahead without really any issue; it certainly accomplished more than the Albuterol alone.
 
Tigger said:
Had a pretty good asthma exacerbation today, 11yo female with global inspiratory and expiratory wheezing in all fields. Albuterol rescue inhaler used twice prior to arrival and we provided 2 additional nebulized albuterol treatments along with 100mg of Sol-Medrol. The albuterol had zero effect on lung sounds or the patient's work of breathing (which oddly was not particularly great). Generally in this scenario I would think a duoneb would be the next step to try and alleviate the bronchospasm.

However, both protocols that I work under do not allow for Atrovent use in patients 13 years or younger. I can find nothing to support this, but did find a half decent study showing some benefit in using it. So what gives? Are we just behind?
Click to expand...

When you say the work of breathing wasn't great, do you mean the effort was poor, speaking in one word sentences, lack of chest wall movement?

I spent a portion of my career on a pediatric and neonatal critical care flight program in the D.C. metro area. D.C. has one of the highest childhood asthma rates in the nation, hovering right around 12% or so, and the program that I worked for was pretty aggressive in their asthma managment, based off an Asthma scoring system upon initial assessment. We would give Atrovent x 1 dose, 500mcg like other's have said, without any contraindications for age etc. I am not aware of any information, other then the FDA thing like Remi said, that would prohibit it's usage in the pediatric population, based off my experience.

Couple points with pediatrics and asthma:
-Generally the older kids with asthma are the ones I worry about
-If you're still hearing lung sounds things might not be great, but they can certainly be worse
-Peds with an exacerbation often buy themselves a period of continuous albuterol for an asthma score greater then 5
-Often times in the prehospital world the protocols are pretty tight regarding albuterol dosing in the peds population. A "single" neb would just be 2.5mg, but it's not uncommon to give a "round" or hour long neb of either 7.5mg or 15mg based off weight, coupled with other interventions.
-Peds often respond well to a fluid bolus during an exacerbation, and will often get around 40ml/kg in the ED in an acute asthma flare as a baseline treatment.
-*No insult intended to any of our MD's on the board* Typically most ED docs do a pretty poor job in treating moderate to severe asthma in pediatrics in MOST, not all, community hospitals. I attribute this to a low volume of sick pediatric asthma patient's and a general conservative approach to peds all together in community ED's.

Intervention wise my treatment plan goes:
-Albuterol/Atrovent x 1 initial 500mcg dose, albuterol being dosed off weight and asthma score
-20ml/kg NS fluid bolus
-Solu-Medrol 2mg/kg max of 125mg
-Re-evaluated need for additional boluses
-Mag Sulfate 75mg/kg up to 2 Grams
-Terbutaline drip 0.1mcg/kg/min
-BiPAP, possible Ketamine dose in the younger kids
-Try and hold intubation unless absolutely needed, and if so generally will end up in the PICU on Isoflurane
 
Ours is weight based, 25mcg/kg stand alone
 
I have never heard of Atrovent being contraindicated in pediatric patients. In PA, we have it in our protocols as a standing order for asthma. For <14, we give half the adult dose which would be 250mcg.

A drug doesn't need FDA approval in order for it to be used in a particular patient. We use drugs all the time "off-label". A physician has the right to order and give orders for a drug however he/she sees fit.
 
I can give Atrovent to pts 2 years of age or older at 0.5mg three times. We also go the NS fluid bolus route 20ml/kg as someone stated above.

Other meds would be:
Solu-medral 2mg/kg max dose 125mg
Epi 0.01mg/kg max dose .3mg
Mag 50mg/kg max dose 2grams
 
18G said:
A drug doesn't need FDA approval in order for it to be used in a particular patient. We use drugs all the time "off-label". A physician has the right to order and give orders for a drug however he/she sees fit.
Click to expand...

Sure, but there's more to worry about with off-label use, should someone claim they were harmed by the drug.
 
double post
 
250mcg nebulised for all our peds (age<14yrs) with asthma - always has been. i.e. 1/2 the adult dose. Never seen any issues to cause concern when using it.

Melbourne MICA

And on the comment from 18g re his own protocols. <50% of the states in the US have state based protocols employed across the regions in that state or used as a basis for local protocols. What is it when we have power sharing arrangements like county and state governments that they feel they have to do their own thing different from everyone else? You'd have thought in medicine its simply a matter of evidence as to what works best. Not so.
 
Melbourne MICA said:
250mcg nebulised for all our peds (age<14yrs) with asthma - always has been. i.e. 1/2 the adult dose. Never seen any issues to cause concern when using it.

Melbourne MICA

And on the comment from 18g re his own protocols. <50% of the states in the US have state based protocols employed across the regions in that state or used as a basis for local protocols. What is it when we have power sharing arrangements like county and state governments that they feel they have to do their own thing different from everyone else? You'd have thought in medicine its simply a matter of evidence as to what works best. Not so.
Click to expand...
And it is. But what is necessary for an urban service with short transports and a variety of tertiary care centers may not be the same for a rural service with long transports and no other resources. No sense in including things that are not necessary.
 
Melbourne MICA said:
And on the comment from 18g re his own protocols. <50% of the states in the US have state based protocols employed across the regions in that state or used as a basis for local protocols. What is it when we have power sharing arrangements like county and state governments that they feel they have to do their own thing different from everyone else? You'd have thought in medicine its simply a matter of evidence as to what works best. Not so.
Click to expand...

But very much of medicine doesn't have the advantage of clear evidence as to what the best practice should be. This very topic is a perfect example - I'm not sure atrovent has ever been shown to really improve outcomes in most cases of asthma. At least not that giving it in the field is any better than giving it in the ED. So some medical directors want their crews to use it because they feel it helps, and other docs don't bother putting it in the protocols. The fact that its use in peds is off-label just adds another reason to perhaps leave it out of the protocols, especially if your agency has very short transport times.

Some medical directors like midazolam for seizures; others choose lorazepam. Some prefer ketamine over etomidate. Some want fentanyl given before RSI, others don't. Some want most meds given IM if an IV can't be established, others want an IO placed. No firm body of evidence supporting any of these choices, so the protocols reflect the preferences of the MD's writing them.

These things could all be standardized by a committee in DC writing a set of national ALS protocols, but there'd be individual medical directors all over the country who strongly disagreed with certain parts of the protocols.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top