KyleG
Forum Crew Member
- 64
- 0
- 0
If someone has no arms were do you get a BP? Ive heard leg but what part and I also heard side makes a difference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you tried the carotid?
Jokes aside, you could do it at the leg by placing the appropriate size blood pressure cuff (usually thigh size) an inch or two above the popliteal fossa, and place the bell of the stethoscope where you palpate the popliteal pulse. I imagine you could also put the appropriate size blood pressure cuff on their ankle, and place the bell of the stethoscope where you palpate the dorsalis pedis (pedal) pulse or posterior tibial pulse; it's what they do when they find the Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (video) except with a doppler instead of a stethoscope or by palpation.
Nope. Just make sure it's the right size (use the white index and range lines marked on the sphygmomanometer) and the artery line is over the popliteal artery.agreed, would you adjust the reading obtained on the thigh?
It could be worse. I once transported a guy that had no long bones in his arms. Basically, his hands were attached directly to his shoulders. The long bones in his legs were severely deformed, causing his legs to be shortened, twisted, contracted, and pretty much useless as an option for obtaining a BP. I just ended up documenting that I was unable to obtain a BP, due to his physical condition.
Of course, that gave me even less to do on the trip from Indy to Hammond. And he wasn't even a pleasant guy on top of it. Yes, life dealt you a crappy hand, but I am not responsible for that. Don't take it out on me!
I imagine you could also put the appropriate size blood pressure cuff on their ankle, and place the bell of the stethoscope where you palpate the dorsalis pedis (pedal) pulse or posterior tibial pulse; it's what they do when they find the Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (video) except with a doppler instead of a stethoscope or by palpation.
Goofy spots like this usually mean you're going to be palpating the result. Tough to place a scope somewhere like the medial malleolus. IIRC I've auscultated one of these maybe once, and palped a handful. Similar deal using the forearm and radial.
Automated NIBPs work better on these weird locations.
I have tried to "palpate" a pressure using the waveform of a distal pulse ox, but not with any particular success. One day.
It could be worse. I once transported a guy that had no long bones in his arms. Basically, his hands were attached directly to his shoulders. The long bones in his legs were severely deformed, causing his legs to be shortened, twisted, contracted, and pretty much useless as an option for obtaining a BP. I just ended up documenting that I was unable to obtain a BP, due to his physical condition.
Of course, that gave me even less to do on the trip from Indy to Hammond. And he wasn't even a pleasant guy on top of it. Yes, life dealt you a crappy hand, but I am not responsible for that. Don't take it out on me!
Should be, at least to the extent that palpated BPs are (5-20 points low usually). But I'd give it some wriggle room for sure, since other than general weirdness you'll probably have some trouble feeling/hearing those pulses. Definitely a ballpark thing unless you practice a ton.
I was actually surprised at how easy it was to hear the radial so long as the truck is not bouncing terribly. I was just hoping that this was a semi legit technique so my partners stop laughing. I'll use a child cuff on the forearm if it means not having to take the dialysis patients 9 separate layers off.
It could be worse. I once transported a guy that had no long bones in his arms. Basically, his hands were attached directly to his shoulders. The long bones in his legs were severely deformed, causing his legs to be shortened, twisted, contracted, and pretty much useless as an option for obtaining a BP. I just ended up documenting that I was unable to obtain a BP, due to his physical condition.
Of course, that gave me even less to do on the trip from Indy to Hammond. And he wasn't even a pleasant guy on top of it. Yes, life dealt you a crappy hand, but I am not responsible for that. Don't take it out on me!
Sounds like a thalidomide baby.
But back to the BP question...
Rather than the technique, has anyone considered why they are taking a BP?
It seems like it would be a quantitative assessment of perfusion status?
In the absence of quantitative assessment of perfusion, perhaps documenting qualitative (physical findings) of perfusion would be appropriate?
Afterall, if the actual measurement were required for the patient condition, wouldn't there be an invasive BP device?
Solve for Y.
I always understood the importance of vitals for trending purposes should they be needed at a later time, also very few present with physical signs of hypertension even at dangerous levels...