TatuICU
Forum Lieutenant
- 204
- 0
- 0
He is the one who brought up homeopathic medicine.
It doesn't matter if it's "flawed" logic. This isn't a court of law so there is no burden of proof, we are talking about people's feelings and faith.
So I stand by what I said.
Logic is applied to courts of law for logic's sake. Not the other way around. So I'm not sure what your point is. And burdens of proof apply to all scientific realms. "Faith" is a way for some to explain away scientific questions and is therefor subject to the same evidentiary scrutiny as any other hypothesis, hence the ongoing argument between militant theists and militant athiests. I am neither. My point was made in this thread quite some time ago. The rest of this has gone off the rails. Again, as I said before, this thread has ZERO to do with religion.