I find it odd that some seem to get a touch bitter about calling it a "bus". It's just colloquialism....nothing more. Personally, I think "ambo" sounds a bit "douchy". So there you have it.
Egg
"Douchy"? Ambo is a perfectly acceptable way of shortening the word.
Let's consider this from a purely linguistic view:
Our original word is "Ambulance". We want to shorten it to a one- or two-syllable word.
1) We could simply cut off half of the word, and go with "Ambu". However, American-English generally doesn't like words ending with "u", not to mention that the "bu" as in am
bulance has an uncharacteristic sound. Am-bew?
2) We could shorten it to one syllable, and go with "Amb". Amb, like as in Lamb. However, this doesn't 'flow' very well with other sentences ("is the amb here yet?") because you have to stress the "amb". Spoken English is generally Iambic in pattern, and this breaks that.
3) We could go for a longer alternative (that's what she said) and try something like "Ambul", but this suffers still from the "bu" mentioned in (1) except that it sounds more like "Bueller." Bueller, Bueller, Bueller.
I can understand that you might not like "Ambo" because the original word isn't "Ambolance", but when you consider the alternatives for shortening it, it is the lesser of evils.
Why, however, do you think it is "douchy"? Ambo, as we all can tell, is a part of the word R
ambo, and as we all should know, Rambo is a badass. That, alone, makes Ambo the superior term.
Oh, and Hi, EMTLife. I'll post an introduction thread soon.