Disclosure right up front: I am a paramedic from Maryland and the co-creator of EMSpañol, a system for providers who don't speak Spanish to assess and manage patients who don't speak English.
As part of our research into the nature and breadth of the EMS language barrier, we have been asking our colleagues what your opinon is about this question: Should EMS systems be expected to render full scope of practice to non-English speaking patients?
Now please let me say up front that I
1) do not have an answer in mind. I want to know where the general consensus lies on this topic or what the range of opinion is.
2) do not intend this as a racially insensitive question. We started EMSpañol to help Hispanic patients and their EMS providers.
3) cannot be offended. Be polite please especially to each other, but let it rip. I am hoping to hear honest opinions from people with feelings on this topic.
I think we can all agree that whenever we are able, we are to render care to our full ability. No brainer.
But in reality, should we begin treating language barrier as a formal matter within EMS?
For example, we cannot give medications without exploring contraindications, but we can't explore contraindications without the ability to speak to the patient (for whatever cause, stroke, deafness, foreign language, etc.) So should we consider language barrier a contraindication or precaution to medication administration in and of itself?
Further, in a world with limited resources, should we even consider ourselves responsible for rendering a complete ALS scope for non-English speakers? Is it reasonable to expect full care for every language? And if not, which languages should we focus on and how should we do it?
Thank you.
Jeff Dean, NREMT-P, EMSpañol
As part of our research into the nature and breadth of the EMS language barrier, we have been asking our colleagues what your opinon is about this question: Should EMS systems be expected to render full scope of practice to non-English speaking patients?
Now please let me say up front that I
1) do not have an answer in mind. I want to know where the general consensus lies on this topic or what the range of opinion is.
2) do not intend this as a racially insensitive question. We started EMSpañol to help Hispanic patients and their EMS providers.
3) cannot be offended. Be polite please especially to each other, but let it rip. I am hoping to hear honest opinions from people with feelings on this topic.
I think we can all agree that whenever we are able, we are to render care to our full ability. No brainer.
But in reality, should we begin treating language barrier as a formal matter within EMS?
For example, we cannot give medications without exploring contraindications, but we can't explore contraindications without the ability to speak to the patient (for whatever cause, stroke, deafness, foreign language, etc.) So should we consider language barrier a contraindication or precaution to medication administration in and of itself?
Further, in a world with limited resources, should we even consider ourselves responsible for rendering a complete ALS scope for non-English speakers? Is it reasonable to expect full care for every language? And if not, which languages should we focus on and how should we do it?
Thank you.
Jeff Dean, NREMT-P, EMSpañol