Guardian, I think it's time for me to clarify what I meant. I mean that if you accept the cert/lic in that area, you are accepting their protocols, how they are written, if you don't like them, don't work there. Just like Rid said, he gave the reason that he wouldn't work in an area, the protocols are there, either accept or reject, but you can't have both.
I think it's time to clarify what I meant, again. There have never been protocols written, nor will there ever be protocols written to satisfy me. You can write a trillion pages of protocols, and I guarantee it won't be enough to prepare me for any situation I might encounter. Thus, we have to be willing to think outside our protocols and even deviate from them. If not, there will come a time when an ems provider lets someone die because a nationally recognized, easy treatment--well within their scope--isn't performed simply because it wasn't in their protocols. Earlier in this thread, I outlined a very easy to understand example involving a tk and a 40 min entrapment that highlights this point perfectly. This is basic, basic, stuff guys. The world is not black and white. Protocols at their best, are guidelines. During the Apollo 13 incident, they used protocols to fly the rocket. When an unexpected error occurred, the protocols went right out the window (figure of speech). If they had continued following protocols at that point, those three men would have died. They had to get together and do some critical thinking. They had to find a way to make a CO2 filter out of extra crap they found lying around. On the spot, they had to calculate how to use the lunar module rocket to propel the men around the moon and back to earth (something it wasn't designed to do). They had done very extensive research and had thousands of protocols. But to save the men, they were forced to deviate from those protocols. Basic, basic stuff guys.