CodeBru1984
EMT
- 990
- 324
- 63
While the AEMT has the higher scope of practice, because the AEMT isn't on duty, the on-duty EMT crew has scene authority. That means that the EMT crew can accept or reject the offer of assistance. In my local area, if I am "affiliated" with an ALS provider, I'm explicitly authorized to provide full ALS scope while off-duty. Here's where things get interesting: should an on-duty BLS 911 rig show up, I can legally turn the patient over to the BLS crew without an issue as long as I am not turning the patient over to them with something that they're not allowed to monitor. Can a BLS crew monitor a patient that's intubated? Yes. A patient that's got a line of NS going? Yes. A chest tube that I placed? Yep.
The reality is that I'm going to provide BLS-only care, turn the patient over to the on-duty crew, and beat feet. I have other things to do with my time than be stuck in an ambulance providing care when the on-duty crew is capable of handling things and (more importantly) arranging for further care... even if they're BLS-only.
I wasn't aware that in Ca if your are "affiliated" with an ALS provider that one has an explicit authority to provide full ALS scope of practice off duty. Is this a new policy? From my understanding, Ca EMS providers (EMT/Paramedic) have no duty to act off duty.
Last edited by a moderator: