Chief Complaint
Forum Captain
- 429
- 1
- 0
I'm not going to list the links, but it might be worth it to do a search of "polygraph" on this forum-- there have been good discussions in the past.
One of the things I do know on a federal level is that polygraphs are NO LONGER admissible in court, and CANNOT be used for pre-employment screening, absent of a few federal agencies. Significant scientific research has demonstrated they DO NOT WORK, are easily manipulated and function off of the examiner scaring you into believing it all works.
I found some good threads on this site as well as other message boards, thanks.
It is indeed a shame that polygraph testing is still used to disqualify potential employees even though it is not considered to be an accurate form of testing (not admissible in court), but its an issue that i will have to deal with since i live in an area of the country that doesnt feel that way.
I, and many others, have skeletons in our closets that apparently will be held against us forever. Nobody to blame but myself, but stupid decisions are often made by young people. I understand disqualifying people based on a criminal record, but thats not my issue.
After re reading some of the application documents and posts in some online discussion forums, it pains me to say this, but i just cant be 100% truthful and expect to get a job around here. Although most of my drug use occured a decade or longer ago, some of the drugs i experimented with will likely be automatic disqualifiers.
Id be crazy to think that a county would hire me if they knew the full extent of my drug history. I have no problem admitting to some minor recreational use of 1 or 2 drugs, but i dont think it would be wise to disclose all information and expect to be seriously considered for a job.