bstone
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,066
- 1
- 0
It wasn't BLS administration. It was ALS administration by an EMT.
I love how you are splitting hairs. You do realize that every intervention I provide is ILS, correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't BLS administration. It was ALS administration by an EMT.
It is not hair splitting. It is applying the proper terms to what you are doing.I love how you are splitting hairs. You do realize that every intervention I provide is ILS, correct?
It is not hair splitting. It is applying the proper terms to what you are doing.
Would you rather me tell you that you're not really ALS? I don't get why someone who is practicing ALS would go out of their way to deny it, as if there is some shame in that.
These word games are above you, Aidey. They require a physicians order. Therefore, they are ALS. Period.
Again, we're not labelling the people administering the intervention. We are labelling the intervention itself. You are neither ALS nor BLS. You are an EMT. The interventions you provide are both ALS and BLS.
The problem with attempting to label advanced interventions as "BLS" is that it cheapens the seriousness of that intervention, causing way too many providers to take them for granted with the typical EMT attitude of, "Well, it's just BLS, so it's not really that dangerous", which could not be farther from the truth. Instead of reclassifying Epi as BLS, why don't you reclassify yourself as ALS, take pride in that privilege, and accept it in a professional manner rather than arguing with the people who have spent three decades paving the way for you to have that privilege?
1. EMTs using Basic life support interventions are working off of a physicians orders as well... Just because a physician ordered it doesn't make it ALS.
2. Because I have seen the difference in what is carried on an ALS ambulance and a BLS ambulance. An epi pen certainly doesn't qualify one as an Advanced Life Support Rig.
Its not about the method of delivery, its about the fact that you are administering a medication for a desired effect. Which would constitue and advanced procedure.
Just so we're all on the same page;
Aj
Is providing someone with oxygen Advanced Life Support?
I think that EMT-B's should be trained at the minimum to be able to administer EPI-Pens and albuterol via nebulizer. It may take more training but if you are on a basic truck there is a chance you could go on a call.
I mean you can bag the patient if needed and treat for shock. That is still time when the organs aren't getting perfused as well as they could have been with proper medications. Certain life or death issues we need to be trained to give proper medication for. Maybe they should include A&P I and II for all EMT-Basic training nationwide and add a couple of meds.
No, you are correct. ALS being performed by an EMT is still ALS, just like BLS being performed by a paramedic is still BLS. There is really no intelligent way to dispute that.I asked Aj this question. As O2 is my Rx only, then by Aj's definition it's an ALS intervention being done by an EMT-Basic.
Am I wrong?
I totally agree. And that "more training" should take about two years.I think that EMT-B's should be trained at the minimum to be able to administer EPI-Pens and albuterol via nebulizer. It may take more training but if you are on a basic truck there is a chance you could go on a call.
If an Epi Pen is in the BLS Scope of Practice then it is not an ALS intervention. It is considered BLS intervention... You can't just lump prescription drug administration as ALS like you did.
I love how you are splitting hairs. You do realize that every intervention I provide is ILS, correct?
It is an advanced intervention that takes a solid knowledge in chemistry, anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology to safely preform.