Ridryder911
EMS Guru
- 5,923
- 40
- 48
There was no disagreement at all, other than to leave an impression that new nursing graduates are more prepared to provide care than being projected. I teach within nursing programs and realize that for the most part they will pass the minimal acceptance level.
I am not against the nursing profession, as one being a member within it. I do agree as well the false illusion of ill prepared instructors attempting to train EMS students is ridiculous. Graduates of the majority of programs do not meet the normal requirements of any health care providers programs: that is majority and not all. Alike RT and even nursing programs; there are good and bad alike. Yes, unfortunately the over all appearance is poor. Those in EMS much rather work twice as hard and long to make an excuse than to do it right the first time.
My anguish from an all day meeting regarding new standards and how instructors are poorly prepared to make lesson plans and focused base teaching in lieu of the current objective base that is now prescribed. No, we much rather attempt to water down and hope new text books will do it for us. My resolution is simple, make those that teach actually have at least a basic education of an associate degree (w/requirement of a under grad in a limited time) and pass the National EMS Educators test. At the least, we would know that they possess some knowledge in adult education. An uproar from non-academic level programs of course pursued.
Alphabet courses are okay if they are thought as not a certification but rather a recognition that one has passed an agency idea of how to perform specific treatment plans. It definitely does not and should not be interpreted that the provider has special skills or knowledge than any other provider. This again is much more different than board and license certification(s), which many may confuse the two.
Yes, I have noticed the post graduate requirements, and as well the debate that is currently going on. I am glad to see such programs be put in place, but do worry with the current economy if compensation will accompany these graduates? My state has a very active PA programs as the first state that had a graduate degree program and now will be requiring NP's to have post graduate/doctoral level within a certain time frame. Again, another argument and discussion elsewhere.
R/r 911
I am not against the nursing profession, as one being a member within it. I do agree as well the false illusion of ill prepared instructors attempting to train EMS students is ridiculous. Graduates of the majority of programs do not meet the normal requirements of any health care providers programs: that is majority and not all. Alike RT and even nursing programs; there are good and bad alike. Yes, unfortunately the over all appearance is poor. Those in EMS much rather work twice as hard and long to make an excuse than to do it right the first time.
My anguish from an all day meeting regarding new standards and how instructors are poorly prepared to make lesson plans and focused base teaching in lieu of the current objective base that is now prescribed. No, we much rather attempt to water down and hope new text books will do it for us. My resolution is simple, make those that teach actually have at least a basic education of an associate degree (w/requirement of a under grad in a limited time) and pass the National EMS Educators test. At the least, we would know that they possess some knowledge in adult education. An uproar from non-academic level programs of course pursued.
Alphabet courses are okay if they are thought as not a certification but rather a recognition that one has passed an agency idea of how to perform specific treatment plans. It definitely does not and should not be interpreted that the provider has special skills or knowledge than any other provider. This again is much more different than board and license certification(s), which many may confuse the two.
Yes, I have noticed the post graduate requirements, and as well the debate that is currently going on. I am glad to see such programs be put in place, but do worry with the current economy if compensation will accompany these graduates? My state has a very active PA programs as the first state that had a graduate degree program and now will be requiring NP's to have post graduate/doctoral level within a certain time frame. Again, another argument and discussion elsewhere.
R/r 911