you assess ur pt. and determine priority... if ALS is not needed... u cancel based on pt presentation at that time. You cant be held liable cause a pt. was stable at the time ALS was cancelled and then 30mins later the pt dies from an AAA. It doesnt take a mastermind to have a firm grasp on the ALS scope of practice and a knowledge of their modalities and to be able to know if ALS is needed.
There is a specific BLS protocol for cancelling ALS in PA so litigation wise its not a concern as long as you didnt cancel for something that blatantly required ALS for example CP, dyspnea, hypoglycemia, anaphylaxis, exacerbated COPD, etc, etc and a negative consequence was had as a result of your decision to cancel.
Again, EMT's ARE MORE THEN CAPABLE OF DETERMINING IF A PATIENT NEEDS ALS!! THIS IS VERY SIMPLE! Should only paramedic's and nurses now do triage? What happens if a basic triages a pt as a wrong priority? Im tired of this level of care thing be taken way to far.
I agree, make everything an ALS level of care... I wish they would... pay for my education and Ill go back and finish paramedic school tomorrow. But its not gonna happen... EMT's who work in a two-tiered system are more versed then EMTs in all ALS model systems where all EMTs do is drive. As an EMT-Basic I am very confident in my assessment skills and clinical decision making and am well aware of my limitations. There are many times I would cancel ALS but dont because I dont have a cardiac monitor or glucometer to base my decision on. There are many times ALS arrives, and they call medical command for a release to BLS.
It works... and works well.
You make some very valid points. Unfortunately, they are against your emphasis.
Tools do not make the assessment, only the knowledge behind using those tools. That is why more and more EMS services no longer require documentation of oxygen saturation. It is useless. One should never treat a patient based upon the numbers.. the same as an ECG. I have seen numerous normal ECG's with the patient having an AMI! Sorry, a good attorney will shred you apart for not recognizing that AAA, when in fact a better history or better assessment might or would had detected that.
Ignorance is not excusable in patient care.
In regards to
"Should only paramedic's and nurses now do triage?" actually YES! In fact the Federal Government position is that only RN level or above can perform triage at the ED's, they don't feel Paramedics are quite adequate enough.
Sorry, there are too many variables out there. Sure, if it is an isolated injury such as simple laceration, bumps and boo boo's, but in the event of a medical call or those involving potential real trauma ..NO! A 150 hour first aid course is not detailed enough to clear injuries and potential illnesses.
In regards to "them" paying for your education, why should anyone pay for your education? What makes EMT's any different and more special than anyone else? For say nursing, physicians, truck drivers, ministers? If you really wanted to progress, then do like majority of Americans and get a student loan. You could pay it off with the raise you would receive.
Should there be programs to encourage and assist EMS students, sure that would be nice but do we really have to have it, to get providers to want to perform at the gold standard? Shamefully, we have made to many excuses and provided a comfort level for those below.
R/r 911