ExpatMedic0
MS, NRP
- 2,237
- 269
- 83
This pretty much sums it up. PD+EMS=Paradox
This pretty much sums it up. PD+EMS=Paradox
No. We can't even prove that ALS is beneficial other than for respiratory emergencies and pain management. Why would we want to delay a police or fire unit going back into service for the emergencies they are meant for because they have to hop into the back of the ambulance to continue their treatment that a BLS crew cannot transport with alone or diagnostics (eg serial 12-lead)?
This pretty much sums it up. PD+EMS=Paradox
Why the double standard?
Haven't several in EMS been wanting to carry a gun on the job?
If EMTs and Paramedics want the right to shoot people, why shouldn't Police be able to do first aid at the EMT level?
What about SWAT or Tactical Paramedics with the Police department?
Exactly.
Medics are only useful in limited circumstances. Apply your own logic to the problem.
Paramedics struggle with STEMI recognition, true clinical decision making, intubations, advanced procedures, etc. because they 1) are terribly undereducated and undertrained, and 2) have no continuing education or training program useful to keeping them fresh in said advanced areas, and 3) spend the majority of their time driving a taxi as their skills rot.
Yes the way EMS and the ED is used needs to be changed, and its a full spectrum of things. Paramedic education, reimbursement, policy, and reducing unnecessary ED ambulance transports, to name some. To many people just getting taxi rides in an ambulance then dumped on the ED.The majority of patients just need or want to go to and from the doctor because we allowed access to the healthcare system to shift heavily into "emergency" medicine.
This present hybridization of medicine with the transportation industry needs to end.
Perhaps you see the picture as LE caring only to inflict injury. I did not say such a thing. However, there job duties conflict with EMS in a magnitude of ways. To suggest there is no paradox is false, and even if you support LE with PD at an ALS level, does it not form at least a solid conundrum?While it is a humorous picture, it's a bit much to suggest law enforcement cares only to inflict injury.
Doing violence is part of the job and is done out of necessity. Once it is over there is no justification whatsoever for an officer not to see the prisoners injuries are tended to.
Look, if you want to believe that an individual's innate right to self-defense somehow ends just because they put on a work uniform, fine - that's your prerogative.
But I find it difficult to believe that you cannot grasp the difference between an individual carrying a weapon purely for self defense, and an individual performing law enforcement duties.
Maybe you aren't being disingenuous, though....maybe it really is one of those "if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand" things.
In all fairness, this is coming from a JD/MD studentThe two fields are not mutually exclusive as you suggest.
If you read the caption on the photo, I don't think this is for putting a good spin on Police duties.
Did you happen to read any of the discussions on EMS forums about weapon carry?
The big difference here is that police do receive weapons training and can also be trained and certified as an EMT. Rarely will EMTs get the exact same training as a Police Officer at a Police academy. You can try to justify your weapon carry as an EMT but you are still carrying it on the job. Police don't have to use their EMT training everyday either but at least they can be trained and certified with the same competencies to maintain.
Do you think Police are only about beating people while they also have "medic" on their jacket? You should get a better understanding of the role of the Police. In some of these situations, an ambulance may not venture near even if you claim to be carrying your own weapons for self defense. The Police will probably only do the very minimum to control bleeding until safety is reached but may still have advanced training.