King-LT vs. LTSD

They are not intubated in reverse they are intubated normally through the mouth it is accomplished via a guidewire that is inserted retrograde in stead of the typical way of introduction with the facilitation of a laryngoscope.

Intubation: The process of putting a tube into a hollow organ or passageway, often into the airway. The opposite of intubation is extubation.

The intubation is by definition the insertion of the ETT so if it goes in the mouth it is anterograde passing from in to out whether its the guidewire, ETT or King LT is retrograde as you are reversing the procedure from its intended use and direction of insertion. As intubation only refers to the passing of the tube into the hollow organ by definition then retrograde refers to the opposite of normal. Yes the guidewire is retrograde as it is opposite of the way things normally enter the oropharynx. Your bullying isn't going to change the facts or the definitions. You seem to imply that the introduction of the guidewire is the act of intubation and that is completely opposite of the definition of intubation as you are passing something out of the hollow organ not into it.
 
Okay Austin, you almost have it.

Intubation: The process of putting a tube into a hollow organ or passageway, often into the airway
Click to expand...


The opposite of intubation is extubation.
Click to expand...

If you are going into the hollow organ or passageway (airway) you are are intubating. Thus if you are removing a tube, you are extubating. If you are performing a retrograde intubation, you are placing a tube into a hollow organ or passageway but in a manner contrary to the usual. You are not removing the device. The intent of intubation is to place a tube "into" thus intubation - in- tube - ation.

Do you at least understand what "retrograde intubation" is and why it is done or as it is called by the "standard" terminology? Do you not think this is a procedure or for decades doctors didn't know how to correctly name this procedure? Were all of those doctors on all the links I posted wrong in calling this procedure "retrograde intubation"? This is NOT about what I think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
because the king lt is removed after placing the bougie (removed:retrograde) the the ETT is intubated (entered/passed/moved forward:anterograde) with the assisstance of a bougie instead of the layngoscope. it is a conjunction of two words to refer to a procedure just as retrograde intubation in your scenario refers to the procedure of retrograde guidewire intubation but is used as a shortened interchangable abbreviation of the correct name for the procedure. I suppose i should have called it King LT with Flex Guide Endotracheal Tube
Introducer (gum-elastic bougie) retrograde intubation to be 100% accurate instead of the abbreviated retrograde intubation which can mean any of the retrograde intubation procedures and not just the aforementioned King LT bougie procedure or your mentioned guidewire method.
 
Do you at least understand what "retrograde intubation" is and why it is done or as it is called by the "standard" terminology? Do you not think this is a procedure or for decades doctors didn't know how to correctly name this procedure? Were all of those doctors on all the links I posted wrong in calling this procedure "retrograde intubation"? This is NOT about what I think.[/QUOTE]

I am well aware of how the procedure you are describing is and how it is done however when you (or any one for that matter, including doctors) refers to said procedure they are in fact using an acceptable abbreviation of the correct name of the procedure. I cant be any more clear I have posted the definitions for you and pointed out the flaws in your explanation and logic You cant argue definition or that you are using an abbreviation. I'm sorry that you have been using an abbreviation for what you say is 30 years and apparently don't know that it is an abbreviation that refers to many different types of retrograde intubation not just your version. I don;'believe it is malicious it is just the accepted use of an abbreviation and no one has ever corrected you or them because they know what type of retrograde intubation they are referring to and don't need to further clarify. However I also and the others reading this post know what type of retrograde intubation I was referring to as we are in a thread about the King LT and don't need to further clarify. You are trying to argue an inaccurate statement and obviously no matter how much evidence to the contrary you wont admit it. No one said you were wrong about referring to your procedure as a retrograde intubation but I was not wrong either. I have and continue to agree that the type you refer to is a type of retrograde intubation it just is not the only type and to infer that it is is WRONG that's right I said the dreaded words and will probably get banned from the site now cause i said the all mighty ventmedic is wrong and then had the audacity to do something silly like back it up with evidence. You keep trying to make your point but just keep proving mine. I quote the entire definition and you pick the parts of it you like and ignore the rest. Extubation is a the removal of an ETT and is a retrograde or reverse procedure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Retrograde does not mean removed.

Here is an example of a retrograde intubation with a bougie.
http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/reprint/105/6/1720.pdf

Maybe you write the authors of this article to tell them that they are WRONG. This is not retrograde intubation by YOUR definition.

When the bougie is used in the normal manner, it "intubates" the airway in the "normal" direction. If you remove it BEFORE the ETT is introduced, you are not intubating. It then facilitates intubation with the ETT. The bougie intubates the airway in the same direction as the ETT. There is nothing "retrograde" about it as it refers to the act of "intubation" or placing a tube.

The word "retrograde" applies to the manner the intubation is performed. If we were to remove the tube opposite of the normal method of removal, it would be retrograde EXTUBATION. This may apply in rare cases to some types of ETTs placed surgically. It may also apply to some GI tubes that go into the GI tract one way but may be removed another way later.

However, if the tube goes out as expected or in a normal manner and not contrary, it is just extubated. We don't use the word "intubation" to describe the removal of a tube. The tube being removed is "extubated". The tube being inserted is "intubated". This is regardless of what device to facilitate intubation is being used.

If we use a fiberoptic scope to assist intubation, it is a fiberoptic intubation. If we use a bougie, it is a bougie intubation for documentation purposes. If we say it is a retrograde intubation, we mean we have come in from the trachea to facilitate intubation. If we scope someone with a tracheotomy to view just below the cords or even above, we may enter the trach incision and do a retrograde view. That means it is a route opposite of normal for documentation purposes.

If you remove a King tube, you are extubating that tube. It is not retrograde because extubation is the removal of a tube and you are not going "contrary" to extubation so it is not a retrograde extubation.

If you place an ETT, you are intubating that tube. If it is going in the regular way, it is a not retrograde intubation as the bougie or whatever facilitating the intubation is going in the usual direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
extubation by definition is the reversal of intubation or the removal of an ETT in the reverse that it was placed and as such is a retrograde procedure (retrograde:reverse)

And you are correct if I intubate only using the bougie it would be a standard intubation with the use of a bougie. However once the King is introduced into the mix and is removed, extubated to facilitate ETT placement it is then removed in a retrograde procedure and the patient is intubated via the bougie thus being done in reverse something else is placed then removed retrograde to introduce an ETT. This patient isne extubated and then later intubated iy is a fluid procedure. And yes again you could use a bougie in place of a guidewire as they descibe in the article and it would be another type of retrograde intubation, it is just a variation of the aforementioned procedure so in that case it could be refered to with the accepted abbreviation or more accurately a cricothyrotomy with retrograde bougie intubation as the intubation refers to the end act of passing the tube into the trachea not the procedure of cutting the membrane and passing the bougie the only thing that makes this retrograde is that it is exiting the trachea/body through the mouth just as the King LT is in a retrograde fashion prior to intubation in either case in an anterograde fashion. your not gonna cut the membrane and pass the tube form there into the oropharynx thus in the retrograde fashion. Obviously this isnt going to get resolved as I have provided evidence that i believe proves my point and you think you have proven yours so we will agree to disagree.
 
con·trar·y (kntrr)
adj.
1. Opposed, as in character or purpose: contrary opinions; acts that are contrary to our code of ethics.
2. Opposite in direction or position: Our boat took a course contrary to theirs. See Synonyms at opposite.
3. Music Moving in the opposite direction at a fixed interval: playing scales in contrary motion.
4. Adverse; unfavorable: a contrary wind.
5. also (kn-trâr) Given to recalcitrant behavior; willful or perverse.
n. pl. con·trar·ies
1. Something that is opposite or contrary.
2. Either of two opposing or contrary things: "Truth is perhaps . . . a dynamic compound of opposites, savage contraries for a moment conjoined" (A. Bartlett Giamatti).
3. Logic A proposition related to another in such a way that if the latter is true, the former must be false, but if the latter is false, the former is not necessarily true.
adv.

seeing as how when you remove a king LT or extubate it from the esophgagus you are moving it in the opposite direction of the process of intubation then it is by definition contrary and as such is retrograde by your chosen lone definition of retrograde as well as the other definitions or retrograde.
 
The words "removal" and "reverse" or "retrograde" are not the same in the world of medicine. We are not talking about the wind, moon and ethics.

Here's another example:

cardiac catheterization passage of a small catheter through a vein in an arm or leg or the neck and into the heart, permitting the securing of blood samples, determination of intracardiac pressure, detection of cardiac anomalies, planning of operative approaches, and determination, implementation, or evaluation of appropriate therapy.
retrograde catheterization passage of a cardiac catheter against the direction of blood flow and into the heart.


Note that they did not say "remove" catheter. They are going opposite.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thats because they are using the term to refer to the opposite direction of blood flow not the act of inserting or removing the catheter but the process of passing it in the opposite direction of the blood flow. The word can and is used in more then one way thus the multiple definitions. When you remove a King LT it is in the opposite direction of the intent of its purpose iy works when it is inserted not when it is removed so again in your example they are referring to the opposition to the flow of blood but they aren't moving the catheter in the opposite direction of its intent thus they are inserting the catheter anterograde to the heart but retrograde to the flow of blood or reverse, contrary (insert definition of retrograde here). Medicine does not change the definition of words it applies the words of the language in question to describe their procedure plain and simple and a complex multifaceted procedure will require the use of multiple descriptive words thus retrograde guidewire (referring to the guidewire) intubation (referring to the ETT)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the use... You already made your point that you know more than any doctor when it comes to retrograde intubation.

However, you really need to know the difference between intubation and extubation. One is inserting a tube and one is removing a tube. Don't use the word "intubation" if you are removing that tube.

I can hear the attorney now:

When you say you intubated the patient in a retrograde manner, you established an airway?

You: No, I pulled it out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you aren't intubating in reverse are you placing the tube from the lung to the oropharynx? No you are doing a part of the procedure in the opposite of normal ie passing a guidewire from the trachea into the mouth or removing a King LT the opposite of how it was placed in order to then pass the ETT or intubate in the normal manner through the mouth and into the trachea.

And I'm sorry I don't ever remember saying I was or implying that I am smarter then a doctor (although just like you I know I am smarter then some of them) you want everyone to believe that because a doctor refers to a procedure by a abbreviated or generic term that they don't know the proper term, that is your implication not mine. I'm sure they if questioned would know the additional words associated with your procedure but as it has been commonly for years referred to by its abbreviated name would like anyone else call that retrograde intubation as would I. I just recognize that this is not the ONLY type of retrograde intubation.
 
VentMedic said:
What's the use... You already made your point that you know more than any doctor when it comes to retrograde intubation.

However, you really need to know the difference between intubation and extubation. One is inserting a tube and one is removing a tube. Don't use the word "intubation" if you are removing that tube.

I can hear the attorney now:

When you say you intubated the patient in a retrograde manner, you established an airway?

You: No, I pulled it out.
Click to expand...

I am glad you think that you know me I don't presume to know you. While the common term for removing an ETT tube is extubation and is the term I use it is in fact by definition a retrograde and I have posted here and could gladly if asked in court produce the evidence to support that:

"is there any other term that could be used to describe an extubation?"

"Yes per definition, and here are the definitions, it could also be called a retrograde or removal of the ETT, however that term is also used to describe many other procedures and would not be appropriate when documenting a removal of an ETT. It could be used to describe (insert procedures of choice here)"

I never stated that I would document an extubation as a retrograde intubation and never implied that an extubation in and of it self was anything but retrograde unless another tube is inserted to replace it thus making it a retrograde-intubation.
 
austinmedic77 said:
you aren't intubating in reverse are you placing the tube from the lung to the oropharynx? No you are doing a part of the procedure in the opposite of normal ie passing a guidewire from the trachea into the mouth or removing a King LT the opposite of how it was placed in order to then pass the ETT or intubate in the normal manner through the mouth and into the trachea.

And I'm sorry I don't ever remember saying I was or implying that I am smarter then a doctor (although just like you I know I am smarter then some of them) you want everyone to believe that because a doctor refers to a procedure by a abbreviated or generic term that they don't know the proper term, that is your implication not mine. I'm sure they if questioned would know the additional words associated with your procedure but as it has been commonly for years referred to by its abbreviated name would like anyone else call that retrograde intubation as would I. I just recognize that this is not the ONLY type of retrograde intubation.
Click to expand...

All you have done is describe "extubation" of the King tube and called that "retrograde intubation".

This is not new. We have been INTUBATING with alternative devices in the throat for over 30 years. The EOA and EGTA have been around for a long time. Retrograde intubation has been around for at least 50 and it should not be confused with the act of pulling a tube out or "reversing" the tube.

I have linked you to where you can read and listen to many doctors describe "retrograde intubation". This is not just one doctor. Why do you think that these doctors are just making up some abbreviated or generic term? Why are you confusing words for procedures that have long been established? You either don't have a good grasp of intubation AND extubation or just don't understand the importance of proper medical terminology.

It is really not that difficult. If you are intubating a tube, you are not pulling it out. If you are extubating a tube, you are not inserting it.
 
austinmedic77 said:
I am glad you think that you know me I don't presume to know you. While the common term for removing an ETT tube is extubation and is the term I use it is in fact by definition a retrograde and I have posted here and could gladly if asked in court produce the evidence to support that:

"is there any other term that could be used to describe an extubation?"

"Yes per definition, and here are the definitions, it could also be called a retrograde or removal of the ETT, however that term is also used to describe many other procedures and would not be appropriate when documenting a removal of an ETT. It could be used to describe (insert procedures of choice here)"

I never stated that I would document an extubation as a retrograde intubation and never implied that an extubation in and of it self was anything but retrograde unless another tube is inserted to replace it thus making it a retrograde-intubation.
Click to expand...
To be both precise and absurd how about using the following terms:

  • antegrade tracheal tubation
  • retrograde tracheal tubation
Please note that I have avoided the prefixes "in-" and "ex-" for these...

(Might I also suggest that we create a new thread as this one got hijacked...)
 
austinmedic77 said:
"is there any other term that could be used to describe an extubation?"

"Yes per definition, and here are the definitions, it could also be called a retrograde or removal of the ETT, however that term is also used to describe many other procedures and would not be appropriate when documenting a removal of an ETT. It could be used to describe (insert procedures of choice here)"
Click to expand...

Retrograde what? You say "retrograde intubation" when you are removing a tube?

Retrograde extubation? What is different about it? What type of surgical airway are you working with?

I'm going to retrograde the ETT?


Akulahawk said:
(Might I also suggest that we create a new thread as this one got hijacked...)
Click to expand...


Since we are using these terms and still discussing "retrograding the King" we haven't gotten that far of track.
 
and you are taking two terms that describe two different potions of the procedure and trying to combine them into just the act of intubation. Per my OP I am refering to the removal of the King LT as the retrograde portion and the Insertion of the ETT as the intubation just as the Retrograde guidewire refers to the placement of the guidewire into the mouth and the intubation refers to the act of passing the ETT over it and into the trachea as you keep pointing out its real simple to understand. Just like you separated in-tub-ation you also need to separate the words in Retrograde guidewire intubation to adequately describe your procedure. Your not refering to just the act of passing the ETT in your procedure just as I am not referring to only removing the King LT.
 
ret·ro·grade (rtr-grd)
adj.
1. Moving or tending backward.
2. Opposite to the usual order; inverted or reversed.
3. Reverting to an earlier or inferior condition.
4. Astronomy
a. Of or relating to the orbital revolution or axial rotation of a planetary or other celestial body that moves clockwise from east to west, in the direction opposite to most celestial bodies.
b. Of or relating to the brief, regularly occurring, apparently backward movement of a planetary body in its orbit as viewed against the fixed stars, caused by the differing orbital velocities of Earth and the body observed.
5. Archaic Opposed; contrary.

Retrograde again by definition. So yes you could by definition say the King LT is retrograded (Moved backward from its insertion, reversed)

However you again imply that I am using these terms independently which I am not. When you use the terms together they describe what is being done: King LT: removed/retrograde movement ETT:intubation/anterograde movement
 
I gotta say austin, I haven't met many people that didn't understand what intubation and extubation meant. You are amongst the very few.

You have also totally changed your own "wording" of retrograde intubation when Akulahawk gave you a few new terms to play with.
 
I love it when people offer an argument and then can't sort the difference between your and you're, or there and their. I love that that s**t. I just cancelled my trip to Austin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top