Looks like
@DrParasite is pretty busy so I’ll ask later...
yeah i've been travelling a lot, and still trying to catch up. BTW, Virginia's EMS symposium was awesome, highly recommended.
to which part? that ALS fire departments don't save lives? well, you can look at
https://www.jems.com/2019/04/16/too-many-medics-debating-a-tiered-response-vs-all-als-ems-system/ saying all ALS units aren't always good. for the fire specific stuff, you can check out
https://epmonthly.com/article/back-to-basics/. Are you able to provide any statistics that support the claim that ALS first responders have a statistical impact on patient mortality?
As for the giving up EMS calls, just go into any firehouse, especially a busy fire house, and ask them if they were to stop going on EMS calls what their thoughts would be.
don't believe me? you can check out the data for yourself
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Resea...ls/Emergency-Responders/Fire-department-calls
under staffed or overused?
understaffed. We (EMS providers) can't stop people form calling 911, and it's generally not a good practice to deny sending an ambulance, without at least assessing the patient (public education can only work so well, especially with the push for socialized medicine, 911 and the ER will remain the catchall). Not only that, but we have spent decades educating the public that in case of an emergency, they should call 911; maybe we should have clarified what an emergency is, but you can't put that genie back in the lamp now. We should be sending EMS to EMS calls, and only requesting the FD when we need additional manpower (lifting assistance, cardiac arrest, rescue situations/MVAs, etc), but too many EMS systems are underfunded and understaffed.
My unscientific opinion is you should have as many BLS units as engines in a given area, and ALS units as ladders and specialty pieces. In an all ALS system, has as many ambulances as staffed engines for a given areas.