I doesn't though. It demonstrated in a statistically small group of patients who happened to have the essentially same timeline in a nonblinded study. Despite having a small number of patients it showed the CT cohort to be far more comorbid. It shows an average CT duration of 9 minutes, which is far longer than reasonable. They admit that the CT patients took 15 minutes longer after CT to receive TPA, which there is no real discussion of what the delay was. There is no discussion of what the MRI scanners or CT scanners actually are, since duration is very long for CT and short for MR I would presume the CTs were old and the MRI was new and high power.
"Our study has several limitations. (1) The THRACE trial was not designed for the purpose of the current study and randomization was not stratified on imaging modality. As a consequence, the choice of imaging modality may have depended on confounding variables. For instance, in centers using MRI as a prime screening imaging modality in stroke patients, the most severely ill patients might be directed towards CT."
Im sorry but this isn't a real study. It's essentially a case study.