Ridryder911
EMS Guru
- 5,923
- 40
- 48
It can be and is done throughout many areas of the country and international. It is dependent upon how important EMS is to the community. There is ad valorem taxes that can be added to land, tag taxes that can be added specific to EMS, cigarette/liquor (sin tax) that can be specific.
It takes interest, it takes hard work, and legislation. Something that most EMT's do not want to work upon; rather they have someone else do it for them. Then when there is no funding, no respect, no benefits or longevity we wonder why?
We are now suffering to cover for communities that do not have or inadequate EMS increasing the costs for those that do provide. In other words services similar to mine having to cover communities that do not have (because they cannot afford). This is a new heated debate.
Our State EMS has decided that the "nearest" EMS must respond. In other words one unit may have to respond frequently to a community 30-50 miles away, although that may cause the primary area to be without coverage and as well the local community responsible for funding the EMS. So what does one do? Not respond, or keep responding to communities and areas where they are not in the original district and do not offer funding? I
So here is the dilemma: Not to answer to cries for help or for a community be responsible to provide care for another? Then why should a community ever think of supporting EMS if another will do it for them?
It takes interest, it takes hard work, and legislation. Something that most EMT's do not want to work upon; rather they have someone else do it for them. Then when there is no funding, no respect, no benefits or longevity we wonder why?
We are now suffering to cover for communities that do not have or inadequate EMS increasing the costs for those that do provide. In other words services similar to mine having to cover communities that do not have (because they cannot afford). This is a new heated debate.
Our State EMS has decided that the "nearest" EMS must respond. In other words one unit may have to respond frequently to a community 30-50 miles away, although that may cause the primary area to be without coverage and as well the local community responsible for funding the EMS. So what does one do? Not respond, or keep responding to communities and areas where they are not in the original district and do not offer funding? I
So here is the dilemma: Not to answer to cries for help or for a community be responsible to provide care for another? Then why should a community ever think of supporting EMS if another will do it for them?