Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when a cardiac patient goes unresponsive on the ambulance, we have to stop and turn off the ambulance, and attach the aed first?
Actually, the answer that they would like is TRUE. We had a very similar question, and although several sources say that they wouldn't do that, that is the answer that they want you to say.
Actually, the answer that they would like is TRUE. We had a very similar question, and although several sources say that they wouldn't do that, that is the answer that they want you to say.
If a Pt goes unresponsive the first thing you need to check is your ABC's.
Trust me, answer is false. Patients go unresponsive all the time, not a reason to delay transport. Otherwise some of our most acute patients would never make it to the er.
Sometimes they go "unresponsive" just to eff with ya. Some of them are very good at it too.
this made me spit my drink. thank u!! might make it my signature with your permissionSometimes they go "unresponsive" just to eff with ya. Some of them are very good at it too.
Have not had to fool with pure BLS in a while but I would assume you would need to check for respirations and a pulse first.
If a Pt goes unresponsive the first thing you need to check is your ABC's.
No such thing as a trick question. The problem is that apparently too many EMT classes only use, or the vast majority of their questions are, first degree questions whereas most of the NREMT questions are second degree clinical vignettes.That was a common trick question in two ways,
Which in real life doesn't work that way. I'm not going to wait for the self check before attaching the pads.for BLS especially, we never attach the AED first, we power it on so that we know if it passes the self test while continuing to the next steps.
Reasons to stop:Second issue, if it's a cardiac arrest why on earth would he have to stop the bus to use an AED... he needs to haul *** while figuring out if an ALS intercept or straight Code-3 to the ER is the right call. My favorite part about these questions is that they intentionally try to throw you off when the answer is really right in front of you.
No such thing as a trick question. The problem is that apparently too many EMT classes only use, or the vast majority of their questions are, first degree questions whereas most of the NREMT questions are second degree clinical vignettes.
Which in real life doesn't work that way. I'm not going to wait for the self check before attaching the pads.
Reasons to stop:
Better compressions when not moving.
Who ever is driving can come back and help with CPR.
Eliminates artifact in the AED.
I am looking at it like this, the patient needs advanced life support, CPR is only going to sustain them at best, unless an ALS intercept is around the corner and will take over care stopping means time and tissue. I have to agree with you with the AED however that only works with VF/VT and then successful use of the AED reduces rapidly over time, in that case maybe pull over to shock and then continue Code-3 if unsuccessful after the first 4 minutes (2 cycles, 2 shocks). This is not coming off of protocol alone but we learned in ACLS that after the first 10 minutes, the odds of the patient coming around with VT/VF are extremely low even with proper defibrilation and drug therapy, so why lose the golden minutes when advanced care has the best odds of working?
Did someone say ABC's or is it CAB's now... I don't know if I love or hate the new ECC guidelines for 2010 :glare: