From an MSNBC slide show:
This is where EMT's could help. Over 100 people who cannot take care of themselves. Two trying to take care of all of them. Two people. Each has to take care of over 50 patients. Who says an EMT would not be more valuble than the average Red Cross volunteer?
When you have 1 local red cross volunteer and 1 EMT you have 2 mouths to feed not 1.
Logistics is what solves crisis like this. There is a major issue with logistics.
Are you suggesting that in the EMT (or even medic) curriculum they were even taught the basic needs of humans, what aid is needed and how to deliver aid in a disaster? (I have taught for years, never once saw it in the curriculum)
Perhaps the EMTs could figure out where to get the medicine, clean sheets, food and water from that even the resources available to the US military is struggling to distribute?
I urge you to go to the international redcross website and look at the qualifications they demand of international aid workers and the needs.
These are current vacancies:
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_vacancies
Not to be confused with those jobs always in demand:
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_skills_always_in_demand
(I was particularly surprised they want surgeons with 5-7 years of experience to be considered) How do you measure up to that? I certainly don't come close.
The 120 hour EMT looks a little meager compared to these. Again consider as far as skills go, it is still better to logistically to teach a local 1 or 2 skills then it is let loose a bunch of basic providers that only add to the needs of the situation.
As for the elderly and chronically infirm, these people are expected to die. Look up the current disaster recommendations in the US. Even young children are on the bottom of the list for resources! (that is a realistic part of the tragedy)
It is a far different game then what is played in the US under normal conditions. There probably only 2 people taking care of the people in your picture because the rest left to search out food and water. They are laying in the steet because there is no way to take them somewhere else. They can't get medicine to the people to administer.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100117/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_haiti_waiting_to_die
"One man has already died, and administrator Jean Emmanuel said more would follow soon unless water and food arrive immediately.
"I appeal to anybody to bring us anything, or others won't live until tonight," he said, motioning toward five men and women who were having trouble breathing, a sign that the end was near."
What are you planning to do? Use a BVM on them till help arrives? (before you say "yes." Consider you are doing nothing for the illness and metabolic needs causing the trouble breathing)
I'm not trying to be mean to EMTs, tremendous resources are already on site. The Most experienced and educated people from around the globe are trying to overcome the difficulties. People who have done this before, people who practice it before "the big one" hits.
Arguing that you can change a diaper (when there are no diapers) or that you can inject medicine (that cannot be delivered to the sick) or that you will provide "first aid" unfortunately demonstrates you do not even understand what "helps." You can post all the heart wrenching photos you like, you cannot help. You are out of your league.