Hey all,
I wanted to post about this situation I had the other day when I was with a patient on a ER con run. The patient was about 60 years old, and was fairly obese (not incredibly large), and her chief complaint from charge nurse was fever onset 3 hours prior (about 101 degrees), and congestion.
When I came into her room, she was very rigid and tense. I could NOT move her arm at all without incredible force (I was surprised at such rigidity for a old lady, but the human body is quite the wonder when it is defensive against something). She was conscious and alert with spontaneous eye movement, but I could not communicate with her although I'm sure she could hear the sound of my voice.
Her arms were in almost like a rabbit-like position if you can imagine it. Because her arm was bent, I could not put the steth or even wrap my cuff around her arm due to the lack of straightening for the antecubital region.
So I went for the femoral artery. This was my 1st time ever doing BP by femoral artery. It was mentioned during my course, but I never actually tried it. So I put the cuff proximal above the femoral artery around the thigh, and palpated to find the femoral artery itself. Now it was very difficult for me to find it because I've never really needed to palpate for that artery before. It took me a couple of tries but I found it underneath all the mass. I proceeded to take the BP normally and was surprised that the value was about 204/104 mmHg. Patient also was tachycardic. This was quite the concern for me as I prepared for the worse; it was also difficult for me not being able to communicate with her as she was unable to speak so I could ask any SAMPLE or OPQRST questions especially if she had chest pain. However, the nurse did not report this so I did not want to jump to any conclusions.
I took the BP a second time and I got about around the same values, 200/100ish. At this time my partner comes in and I'm like, "Man, I'm really iffy about this BP." So he told me to take it by palpation via radial on the brach. I was able to somehow shimmy the cuff into adequate positioning and I proceeded to take the BP twice. And I got about 130/90 both times. At this time the nurse also checked and said she got that as well. We transported her to ER and hooked her up to the monitor and her BP was about 130-140 as I palpated.
So after this call I was really kind of bugged about it. Why when I auscultated by femoral artery was the BP so high? I did it twice and I got the same results and I am PRETTY confident with my auscultating BP skills. But, as this was my first femoral artery - I was a bit insecure thereafter. I'm glad I know how to do it now - but I am just concerned with the accuracy of it. I'm glad that my palpated radial worked out to be the correct. If any other situation and I had power to make a choice when it came to 130 vs. 200 BP, things could have been mad. I want to ask you all for your opinion about taking the femoral artery for BP. Is it accurate? Did I just do it wrong? is the femoral artery the only other "reasonable" way to take BP if you can't take it by brachial? And how can you easily find the femoral artery generally? (for brachial you can hear at the antecubital region, to palpate it under the bicep generally works). With general alternatives to BP by brachial, if we can't do it by arm at all - is femoral the logical choice (say if condition is good to take BP)? And if that doesn't work -> can you do palpation by pedal pulse with cuff? (just thinking outside the box since the order is usually BP by femoral -> BP by palpation radial -> or BP by femoral -> and also palpate by pedal BP?)
With regard,
Michael
I wanted to post about this situation I had the other day when I was with a patient on a ER con run. The patient was about 60 years old, and was fairly obese (not incredibly large), and her chief complaint from charge nurse was fever onset 3 hours prior (about 101 degrees), and congestion.
When I came into her room, she was very rigid and tense. I could NOT move her arm at all without incredible force (I was surprised at such rigidity for a old lady, but the human body is quite the wonder when it is defensive against something). She was conscious and alert with spontaneous eye movement, but I could not communicate with her although I'm sure she could hear the sound of my voice.
Her arms were in almost like a rabbit-like position if you can imagine it. Because her arm was bent, I could not put the steth or even wrap my cuff around her arm due to the lack of straightening for the antecubital region.
So I went for the femoral artery. This was my 1st time ever doing BP by femoral artery. It was mentioned during my course, but I never actually tried it. So I put the cuff proximal above the femoral artery around the thigh, and palpated to find the femoral artery itself. Now it was very difficult for me to find it because I've never really needed to palpate for that artery before. It took me a couple of tries but I found it underneath all the mass. I proceeded to take the BP normally and was surprised that the value was about 204/104 mmHg. Patient also was tachycardic. This was quite the concern for me as I prepared for the worse; it was also difficult for me not being able to communicate with her as she was unable to speak so I could ask any SAMPLE or OPQRST questions especially if she had chest pain. However, the nurse did not report this so I did not want to jump to any conclusions.
I took the BP a second time and I got about around the same values, 200/100ish. At this time my partner comes in and I'm like, "Man, I'm really iffy about this BP." So he told me to take it by palpation via radial on the brach. I was able to somehow shimmy the cuff into adequate positioning and I proceeded to take the BP twice. And I got about 130/90 both times. At this time the nurse also checked and said she got that as well. We transported her to ER and hooked her up to the monitor and her BP was about 130-140 as I palpated.
So after this call I was really kind of bugged about it. Why when I auscultated by femoral artery was the BP so high? I did it twice and I got the same results and I am PRETTY confident with my auscultating BP skills. But, as this was my first femoral artery - I was a bit insecure thereafter. I'm glad I know how to do it now - but I am just concerned with the accuracy of it. I'm glad that my palpated radial worked out to be the correct. If any other situation and I had power to make a choice when it came to 130 vs. 200 BP, things could have been mad. I want to ask you all for your opinion about taking the femoral artery for BP. Is it accurate? Did I just do it wrong? is the femoral artery the only other "reasonable" way to take BP if you can't take it by brachial? And how can you easily find the femoral artery generally? (for brachial you can hear at the antecubital region, to palpate it under the bicep generally works). With general alternatives to BP by brachial, if we can't do it by arm at all - is femoral the logical choice (say if condition is good to take BP)? And if that doesn't work -> can you do palpation by pedal pulse with cuff? (just thinking outside the box since the order is usually BP by femoral -> BP by palpation radial -> or BP by femoral -> and also palpate by pedal BP?)
With regard,
Michael
Last edited by a moderator: