Your medics are getting screwed! I'd laugh at anything below 15! My lowest paying job of three is 18!
True. Many agencies won't start at more than $30-$35k/yr, and require a 48-56 hour schedule to see that income. That's only $11-$13/hr, give or take. 56 hour schedules are the biggest scam if they're paying anything less than $50k/yr to start, IMO. Realize that for every five hired, the agency gets over by not having to pay for benefits, hiring, retirement, equipment, OT for schedule gaps for two people, if it were a 40 hour schedule. seven 40 hour employees = five 56 hour employees. 7 x 40 = 280 (hours). 56 x 5 = 280. They're saving greatly on personnel costs, and then lowball the employees with salary. Any Administative Assistant straight out of high school could equal or trump a 56 hour medic's pay rate ($11/hr, +/-).
I like to compare my former salary at NS-LIJ in NYC to a starting RN. $22/hr starting, up to $26.72 after probation, and $31 to top out after a year and a half. We'll use $26.72 vs a RN's starting salary of around $70k (circa 2006) for comparison's sake. The RN's hourly would be at about $33.65/hr. So, as a six month medic, I was making 79% of a starting RN's salary. If you want to make a comparison in your area, take the everage RN's starting (hourly)salary, multiply it by 79%, and see how your pay compares.
For real life examples, nurses in my area start at around $25/hr IIRC. Out of the fire academy, my base was around $19/hr, plus $5k/yr cert pay, hourly riding pay, etc. That's right in line with my 79% benchmark, even before the bonuses. At my former Third Service employer, I made around $38k/yr, which was about $11.50/hr. Nurses also started at around $25/hr. So, if you work at a 56 hour workweek agency for a starting salary of $38k/yr, you're a sucker that's only making 46% of a starting RN's salary! I was that sucker, and that caused me to leave that situation quickly to get that percentage back up.
Hope this helps.